|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 13:39:51 GMT
Never really cared for this individual ( that goes for most on here) but, seeing as we have had a succsesful end to this seasons campain, i would very much like the extended hand of the aministrator give him another chance and unban him. he provides lots of talking points and is a tad contrversial (unlike myself ) and he provides another angle of thought towards all things qpr. not sure how to create a poll but leave a yes or no in the comments section of this thread. LETS GIVE THIS QPR MAN ANOTHER CHANCE. YES 1
|
|
|
Post by Jon Doeman on May 25, 2012 13:41:29 GMT
Yes 2.. And I believe you care for me really S.hitman!
|
|
robbie
Neil Warnock
Posts: 556
|
Post by robbie on May 25, 2012 13:45:38 GMT
yes 3
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 25, 2012 13:48:48 GMT
No thanks, had enough of his constant abuse aimed at me.
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on May 25, 2012 13:52:14 GMT
Thank you. And obviously everyone's opinion can be expressed on this matter. Or any other matter. But unfortunately.... We have a very open approach on this board accepting all applicants whatever their previous posting record (And even regardless of what they may have said about this board or about individual moderators, elsewhere) But at the same time, we are serious about how people are to post on this board. We bend over backwards not to ban. And we certainly don't ban because someone may have a different view about something re QPR or football. (Just as we don't close threads when the argument may be going in a direction contrary to the one we favour) And while other board may be interested in power games - or having points and suspensions - and permitting banned posters to return time and time again under new names. This board does not. A few have come on this board with only one intention: That is to stir, and provoke and insult - and even...shock/horror: To lie. Others are, for whatever reason, unable to control themselves in their postings. They know what they're doing is contrary to this board. And yet they persist. And on those occasions, with reluctance and after discussion, moderators decide that there are so many boards out there: Perhaps they would be more suited elsewhere. I refer you to the Welcoming State which sets out the Approach and expectations of this board qprreport.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8Thanks Addendum: I see that Hitman has now instituted a Poll. Everyone is of course free to vote. But I have to tell you, in all honesty that regardless of the size or majority of teh vote, decisions to ban or not ban (or hypothetically to unban) are going to be made in accordance to how we moderators perceive/interpret posters are keeping to the paramaters and rules of this board. Banning decisions have never been made lightly. And they were always made for what we see as just cause. Be you a believer in Karma or an aficionado of Dentists. Thanks And of course....Onwards and Upwards
|
|
bowles
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,939
|
Post by bowles on May 25, 2012 13:56:13 GMT
Yes 2.. And I believe you care for me really S.hitman! he you nicked my shiteman joke and changed it to s.hitman! you dam cad!
|
|
bowles
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,939
|
Post by bowles on May 25, 2012 14:01:32 GMT
mikie hunt was a c.................................................
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:01:59 GMT
can democracy work?
keep voting people................... yes or no?
will you let the majority of this board decide macmoish or is decided by the selected few?
1 more chance 1 more chance 1 more chance. god bless you.
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:03:10 GMT
i love you dough man
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on May 25, 2012 14:06:57 GMT
Thank you. And obviously everyone's opinion can be expressed on this matter. Or any other matter. But unfortunately.... We have a very open approach on this board accepting all applicants whatever their previous posting record (And even regardless of what they may have said about this board or about individual moderators, elsewhere) But at the same time, we are serious about how people are to post on this board. We bend over backwards not to ban. And we certainly don't ban because someone may have a different view about something re QPR or football. (Just as we don't close threads when the argument may be going in a direction contrary to the one we favour) And while other board may be interested in power games - or having points and suspensions - and permitting banned posters to return time and time again under new names. This board does not. A few have come on this board with only one intention: That is to stir, and provoke and insult - and even...shock/horror: To lie. Others are, for whatever reason, unable to control themselves in their postings. They know what they're doing is contrary to this board. And yet they persist. And on those occasions, with reluctance and after discussion, moderators decide that there are so many boards out there: Perhaps they would be more suited elsewhere. I refer you to the Welcoming State which sets out the Approach and expectations of this board qprreport.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&thread=8Thanks Addendum: I see that Hitman has now instituted a Poll. Everyone is of course free to vote. But I have to tell you, in all honesty that regardless of the size or majority of teh vote, decisions to ban or not ban (or hypothetically to unban) are going to be made in accordance to how we moderators perceive/interpret posters are keeping to the paramaters and rules of this board.
Banning decisions have never been made lightly. And they were always made for what we see as just cause. Be you a believer in Karma or an aficionado of Dentists. Thanks And of course....Onwards and Upwards
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:12:44 GMT
No thanks, had enough of his constant abuse aimed at me. come on man! where is your backbone? the amount of abuse i have been getting on here for my views and opinions since i joined dwarf's what you had to put up with from one person and i would nerver call for those people to be banned, even doughman. its just a message board. for the love of god give him another chance man.
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 25, 2012 14:26:37 GMT
No thanks, had enough of his constant abuse aimed at me. come on man! where is your backbone? the amount of abuse i have been getting on here for my views and opinions since i joined dwarf's what you had to put up with from one person and i would nerver call for those people to be banned, even doughman. its just a message board. for the love of god give him another chance man. When I post on a QPR board in a reasonable way about QPR I don't expect to receive abuse from someone purely because of my age.
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:30:19 GMT
remember macmoish, the messageboard is nothing without the people commenting on it. all i ask is that you let the majority of people decide either way.
if you could take your admin hat off for a moment and sever your afiliatons with other mods, would you be inclined to support the posters deciding or would you stick to your views of a rigid rule book?
IF rory withdrew his complaint would you unban mr hunt?
all hypertheticals but would like to know your answers in any case.
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 25, 2012 14:34:17 GMT
The rules are clearly stated in the welcome page. If you don't like them then why do you post one here??
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on May 25, 2012 14:36:03 GMT
All bans given out are lifetime bans, no exceptions.
No bans are given out lightly and each time that poster has abused their last chance, hence the last resort of having to use a ban.
No bans will ever be lifted.
But please do feel free to discuss this and post elsewhere if you find this unacceptable to you.
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:36:22 GMT
come on man! where is your backbone? the amount of abuse i have been getting on here for my views and opinions since i joined dwarf's what you had to put up with from one person and i would nerver call for those people to be banned, even doughman. its just a message board. for the love of god give him another chance man. (walking on egg shells) maybe i should not ask you this in case i get banned but........................................... out of curiosity (whispers) how old are you? When I post on a QPR board in a reasonable way about QPR I don't expect to receive abuse from someone purely because of my age.
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 25, 2012 14:39:09 GMT
(walking on egg shells) maybe i should not ask you this in case i get banned but........................................... out of curiosity (whispers) how old are you? When I post on a QPR board in a reasonable way about QPR I don't expect to receive abuse from someone purely because of my age. 16
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:48:26 GMT
All bans given out are lifetime bans, no exceptions. No bans are given out lightly and each time that poster has abused their last chance, hence the last resort of having to use a ban. No bans will ever be lifted. But please do feel free to discuss this and post elsewhere if you find this unacceptable to you. thakyou for clarifying that peoples opinions dont count and only yours do markqpr. i still await macmoish's reply to my questions above. thankyou for answering roryranger. i was just curious. KEEP VOTING PEOPLE.
|
|
|
Post by Hogan on May 25, 2012 14:51:07 GMT
You come on here clearly stating you dont care for most posters on here, yet you beg for a banned poster to be allowed to post here. I just wonder why you bother? I wonder why you had to not only make your point of not caring for this sites posters but why you started your post with that?
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:51:13 GMT
All bans given out are lifetime bans, no exceptions. No bans are given out lightly and each time that poster has abused their last chance, hence the last resort of having to use a ban. No bans will ever be lifted. But please do feel free to discuss this and post elsewhere if you find this unacceptable to you. germany calling!!! GERMANY CALLING!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by kempton ranger on May 25, 2012 14:54:28 GMT
Yes I found him to be ok,
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on May 25, 2012 14:56:36 GMT
thakyou for clarifying that peoples opinions dont count and only yours do markqpr. My opinion and all the other mods as each decision has to be a majority verdict. You seem to be struggling with the concept of having mods and board rules. Anyone who breaks our rules after repeated warnings will get banned and the rules are posted where they can be seen. Your interpretations are simply childish nonsense.
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 14:58:36 GMT
You come on here clearly stating you dont care for most posters on here, yet you beg for a banned poster to be allowed to post here. I just wonder why you bother? I wonder why you had to not only make your point of not caring for this sites posters but why you started your post with that? RIGHT AND WRONG HOGAN i dont care for most posters on here but i do care to have ones voice to be heard and be counted. even YOURS. just like the supporters club who want to have more input on the club i wish for the posters here to have more imput on this site. the reasons why i personally wish to give mr chunt another chance are stated on the first post of this thread. but to have ones voice heard and listened too on this site is the crux of this thread. even if it was you,rory or doughman or anyone else for that matter, i would be asking the same. i dont see that as a bad thing. do you?
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on May 25, 2012 14:59:15 GMT
This board is what it is. An ever-number of people seem to like it for what it is. And for what it is not. What it focuses on. What it does not. How people post. And how they do not. But regardless of the numbers of posters or viewers, the "Standards" of this board are going to be adhered to.
Those who don't like the ways of this board will never be held back: They are always afforded the opportunity to go boards more to their suiting. Given the sizable number of QPR Boards out there, there is surely a board suited to every taste. And even to set up your own messageboard.
As for moderators: On Board issues: We consult together. We decide together. And then we take responsibility together.
|
|
|
Post by hitman34 on May 25, 2012 15:01:15 GMT
thakyou for clarifying that peoples opinions dont count and only yours do markqpr. My opinion and all the other mods as each decision has to be a majority verdict. You seem to be struggling with the concept of having mods and board rules. Anyone who breaks our rules after repeated warnings will get banned and the rules are posted where they can be seen. Your interpretations are simply childish nonsense. watch it markqpr..... are you taking the piss out of my age? ??
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on May 25, 2012 15:14:39 GMT
My opinion and all the other mods as each decision has to be a majority verdict. You seem to be struggling with the concept of having mods and board rules. Anyone who breaks our rules after repeated warnings will get banned and the rules are posted where they can be seen. Your interpretations are simply childish nonsense. watch it markqpr..... are you taking the piss out of my age? ?? No, simply stating a fact. I imagine most people will vote to say give him another chance, but I bet if they were the recipient of his daily abuse as one poster unfairly was, they would vote not to. It is a last resort as we do try not to ban people and discussing it is fine as well but to try and say that free speech is not encouraged on here is plainly disingenuous of you. But nonetheless, you are still perfectly entitled to your views.
|
|
|
Post by alqpr81 on May 25, 2012 15:32:08 GMT
Seriously...what the HELL is this thread all about?? Hitman, are you Mike Hunts best buddy or something? Quite frankly, the man was a poisonous toad who did nothing besides complain about QPR and post vulgar GIF files, which I actually found rather offensive on occasion.
I'm far from a prude, but I don't expect to come onto a Rangers messageboard and see a picture of some skateboarder losing his face after an accident over and over again, to name but one example. And he wouldn't stop, thought it was all hilarious.
As with Rory, he also has personal vendettas, and dishes out crude insults mainly comprised of extreme foul language and very little intelligent content. These are not the attributes generally associated with members attempting to discuss their opinions in a (generally) civilised way.
Many of us fall out because we disagree strongly with eachother, but this doesn't result in over the top personal attacks using all names under the sun.
He's a stain, and the board is far better off without him. The administrators made the best decision by banning him, and I certainly don't see what justification there is for allowing him to return based merely on the fact that we stayed up this season?
Finally, I don't ever recall him starting a decent discussion, only deteriorating existing threads. Perhaps I missed something there, but either way...a flat out NO.
|
|
|
Post by Hogan on May 25, 2012 15:36:00 GMT
You come on here clearly stating you dont care for most posters on here, yet you beg for a banned poster to be allowed to post here. I just wonder why you bother? I wonder why you had to not only make your point of not caring for this sites posters but why you started your post with that? RIGHT AND WRONG HOGAN i dont care for most posters on here but i do care to have ones voice to be heard and be counted. even YOURS. just like the supporters club who want to have more input on the club i wish for the posters here to have more imput on this site. the reasons why i personally wish to give mr chunt another chance are stated on the first post of this thread. but to have ones voice heard and listened too on this site is the crux of this thread. even if it was you,rory or doughman or anyone else for that matter, i would be asking the same. i dont see that as a bad thing. do you? Every poster has a voice, they have an opinion and they express that opinion here. People will agree or disagree or add their own thoughts to the subject matter.
|
|
|
Post by blatantfowl on May 25, 2012 15:46:42 GMT
I think Hitman's intentions are best described as passive aggressive.
There are more worthy campaigns to put your energy into, either related to QPR or otherwise. If you put this amount of vehemence into helping the OSC you'd soon be a legend.
|
|
|
Post by scarletpimple on May 25, 2012 16:01:15 GMT
Fark me hitman, thats good bait your using i will be asking for a few tips before i go fishing.
Anyway i had no probs with mike but other's did so i say no in support of them.
Plus i support the mods and mike as this is a well run board and there arn't too many around as well run......there you go you got another bite.
|
|