|
|
Post by Macmoish on Mar 12, 2011 19:22:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by klr on Mar 12, 2011 19:37:40 GMT
Anyone seen the photo of it at todays match ?
|
|
|
|
Post by 0hwestlondon on Mar 12, 2011 19:40:10 GMT
YEAH HE MAY HAVE KNOWN SOMETHING, BUT I WAS ALL EMOTIONAL TO AFTER THAT LATE WINNER SO I'LL GIVE HIM THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT ON THAT ONE.
|
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Mar 12, 2011 20:20:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by samp99 on Mar 12, 2011 20:53:08 GMT
Our odds on finishing first (or anywhere else for that matter) haven't changed all week (perhaps did following today's results)... Perhaps we are getting too worried about it
|
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Mar 12, 2011 21:12:38 GMT
Just to repeat myself, we will not get points deducted.
I confirmed this today with the ITK known as Finney. ;D
We are right.
|
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Mar 12, 2011 21:31:12 GMT
From the Mirror Palace Match report by Steve Stammers
"The hierarchy at the Football Association have promised a swift decision on the charges levelled at Queens Park Rangers concerning third-party ownership of Argentine midfield player Alejandro Faurlin. A deduction of points is a possibility, a significant fine is the probability..."
|
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Mar 12, 2011 21:33:40 GMT
If it was as bad as being made out Faurlin would not have been playing.
|
|
|
|
Post by maudesfishnchips on Mar 12, 2011 21:43:03 GMT
If it was as bad as being made out Faurlin would not have been playing. thats a good point, why would we have points deducted because of the games faurlin played in, and for the fa to still let him play today. i know there are other charges involved, but this is my straw and no one is taking it from me. Thanks cpr. |
|
bowles
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,939
|
Post by bowles on Mar 12, 2011 22:08:31 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Mar 13, 2011 1:12:39 GMT
Maybe someone can explain this. L'affaire de Faurlein has ben around for a couple years.
Last september the heat was applied.
Nothing wrong until the season at tail end. Point deduction at that time would cause chaos with the table and promotion and playoffs which really could say that they dont plan any point action.
So tp prem for startin negative. Is there a precedent? More often going the other way as I recall.
Which makes me think that point deductions arent really a part of the plan.
|
|
|
|
Post by maudesfishnchips on Mar 13, 2011 1:34:20 GMT
if we did get a point reduction and ended up in the play off's, and then went on to win promotion, would not the teams we knocked out be saying that it's unfair to play the best team in the league when they could have been playing some one else of a lesser quality?
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Mar 13, 2011 2:16:00 GMT
Right, thats why it makes no sense to wait this late.
|
|
|
|
Post by blueeyedcptcook on Mar 13, 2011 3:03:38 GMT
Just home from mass and voi-la I have seen the light, we will NOT be deducted any points. If you consider that in similar circumstances West Ham were fined 5mill, thus saving the FA on their annual grant. As we are a RICH club, the FA fines the club say 10mill, but we still get our grant of 30mill. Win - Win situation for both parties.  |
|
eskey8
Dave Sexton
www.cycle2austria.com
Posts: 2,274
|
Post by eskey8 on Mar 13, 2011 6:35:23 GMT
CPR is now the most upbeat poster on this board! Who'd of thought ;D |
|
|
|
Post by Lonegunmen on Mar 13, 2011 9:10:59 GMT
Trouble is, our club wont pay their bills to caliendo or dunga allegedly, what chance have the FA got of us paying them too??
|
|
finney
Dave Mangnall
Posts: 175
|
Post by finney on Mar 13, 2011 10:50:19 GMT
Just to repeat myself, we will not get points deducted. I confirmed this today with the ITK known as Finney. ;D We are right. How can i be ITK i is Irish and not even a QPR fan as i was not born in London Quote PPP. |
|
|
|
Post by klr on Mar 13, 2011 12:59:11 GMT
Just to repeat myself, we will not get points deducted. I confirmed this today with the ITK known as Finney. ;D We are right. How can i be ITK i is Irish and not even a QPR fan as i was not born in London Quote PPP. Exactly, how can a "Binlid" like Finney be ITK ?! |
|
|
|
Post by saphilip on Mar 13, 2011 15:50:06 GMT
Andy - as I mentioned in my other thread, the Dunga story should have no bearing on this story - and whether we would pay a fine or not.
The Dunga story is an issue between him and the club - and it is up to to their lawyers to look at the interpretation of whether money is owed or not - and if so who is liable for that.
I must admit I am fearing the worst - but make no mistake if QPR are given a points deduction (or worse) then I am pretty sure the club's lawyers will appeal and take it to court if necessary - and that would be the nightmare scenario for the FA/FL, as it would then drag out.
|
|
jayh
Dave Mangnall
Posts: 110
|
Post by jayh on Mar 13, 2011 17:45:33 GMT
I'm feeling really sick over this, the sense of injustice if the FA dock points, this should be the happiest time i've ever had supporting Rangers and yet i'm feeling sick with worry over what the FA are going to do. Sadly this has tarnished what has been an amazing season.
I do believe if the FA dock points it could be very damaging financially for them in the long run.
|
|
|
|
Post by harlowranger on Mar 13, 2011 17:56:47 GMT
I'm feeling really sick over this, the sense of injustice if the FA dock points, this should be the happiest time i've ever had supporting Rangers and yet i'm feeling sick with worry over what the FA are going to do. Sadly this has tarnished what has been an amazing season. I do believe if the FA dock points it could be very damaging financially for them in the long run. Dont worry Jay , CPR assures us it will all be ok ,just fines and it makes me happier if i believe him . We will finish 10 points ahead of 3rd anyway if we carry on like Saturday , no point worrying until it happens , i felt sick for me two lads on Weds aswell but nothings been tarnished until its tarnished . See what happens ,and it may be sorted out by the time we play Sheff U. Next stop , try to pick up as many points at Donny , while Hull host Norwich , Swansea battle Forest and Cardiff away to Leeds. Its all good mate.  |
|
|
|
Post by maudesfishnchips on Mar 13, 2011 18:04:59 GMT
all sweet jay, at worst we will start off in the prem on a negative. funny how this situation has allowed me to talk about promo now, when before i dare not mention it. and it all looks a lot rosier now with the chasing pack choking  |
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Mar 13, 2011 18:58:27 GMT
Won't even get a fine. Whatever they do we'll appeal it, it'll drag on, the FA are in a no win situation. With our financial backing we could bankrupt the FA. As I said in the pub last night, we could then have Wembley for a new Academy, play important games there next season, rent it to England for their games but mainly let the kids play there.
Now where did I leave that plot....
|
|
|
|
Post by Lonegunmen on Mar 13, 2011 21:14:31 GMT
Trouble is CPR "Our financial backing" havent exactly paid the bills nor flashed the true cash thus far. Phil the reference to Dunga was to show the point that if this is yet another financial issue for the club, why didn't they just pay up, clear the decks of any outstanding bills. Start with a completely clean slate and give the fans some confidence. And should e get a fine if found guilty, pay it. Cheaper than hiring lawyers if we were in reality guilty.
|
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Apr 9, 2011 8:06:24 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Apr 9, 2011 8:07:26 GMT
" The FA, QPR and Mr Paladini shall be making no further comment until the charges are resolved." And this week's The FA - Hearing date set for QPR Tuesday, 05 April, 2011 An Independent Regulatory Commission will hear charges brought against QPR. The FA can confirm an Independent Regulatory Commission will shortly hear charges brought against QPR in relation to alleged breaches of FA Rules. The hearing will commence on Tuesday 3 May, with a decision due on Friday 6 May. Queens Park Rangers FC has been charged with seven breaches of FA regulations. The Club charges relate to the player Alejandro Faurlin and concern the alleged existence of an agreement between the Club and a third party in respect of the player’s economic rights, and the alleged failure by the Club to notify The FA of that agreement before the player was registered to play in England in July 2009. These charges are brought under FA Rules C1(b)(iii) and E3, and the Third Party Investment in Players Regulations, A1 and A2. The Club is also charged with allegedly using or seeking to pay an Unauthorised Agent in relation to the player’s registration in July 2009. This charge is brought under the Players Agents Regulations, A1. The Club and Club Official Gianni Paladini are also charged in respect of allegedly false information contained in documents submitted to The FA in relation to the same player signing an extension to his playing contract with the Club in October 2010. These charges are brought under the Players Agents Regulations, C2, and FA Rule E3. QPR and Mr Paladini have both indicated they are denying all of the charges and shall be contesting them at the hearing. The FA, QPR and Mr Paladini shall be making no further comment until the charges are resolved. www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2011/QPR-Paladini-050411 |
|
|
|
Post by Jon Doeman on Apr 9, 2011 9:45:36 GMT
|
|
