|
Post by Bushman on Dec 18, 2008 15:19:35 GMT
(QPR Report said: Got a lot of grief elsewhere for condeming QPR fan violence and doing a "Name and Shame" (if they are shamed). But I'd say it's just as reprehensible coming from QPR fans as anyone else. Now if you adopt the "Well they started it; we're just defending ourselves" approach, that can probably be applied in many instances for many clubs. )
My thoughts: I do not think there is anything wrong in going down the name and shame route. I am sure we all know a name or two who are still around now who have caused trouble and damage throughout the years in the name of the Rs home and away. I do not see why they should be protected like they are heroes or is it that they are still playground bullies and people fear them.
Anybody got any thoughts on this.
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Dec 18, 2008 18:58:05 GMT
If I did know anyone I would not be naming them to authorities.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Dec 18, 2008 19:43:49 GMT
Of course my "name and shame" was merely posting a newspaper article saying four accused QPR fans were going to be in court charged with... And the newspaper gave their names (as it does with all trials/accused - including "The Gun" trial)
|
|
|
Post by Bushman on Dec 18, 2008 20:37:55 GMT
So are we saying that it's ok then.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Dec 18, 2008 20:52:48 GMT
The potential, most legitimate counter argument would be these are still innocent until proven guilty, etc. The interesting question would be how would people respond re me posting a news story naming names if they had been found guilty/admitted guilt. (I never found in the press what the result of the court hearing was)
I posted re Spurs Trust feeling about the posting of alleged Spurs racist chanters by the police
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Dec 18, 2008 21:25:09 GMT
No
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Dec 20, 2008 15:10:48 GMT
|
|