|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 18:22:54 GMT
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 18:48:05 GMT
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 18:58:49 GMT
www.qpr.co.uk/staticFiles/19/39/0,,10373~145689,00.pdf QPR Holdings Limited FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 31 MAY 2008Excerpts from Chairman Briatore's ReportOn behalf of the Board of Directors, I am delighted to present the annual financial statements and report for the year ended 30 May 2008 with a review of what has been a historic year for Queens Park Rangers Football Club. In November 2007, we saved the club from certain administration and completed the takeover of QPR Holdings Limited, with the clear aim of seeking promotion from the Championship to the Premier League. Shortly afterwards, we were pleased to announce that we had secured a 20% investment from the Mittal family. We understand the QPR heritage and our role as fans, owners and custodians of the Club. We believe in being courageous in the development of the Club and in taking managed risks. At the same time we remain committed to developing the long-term sustainability of the Club through maintaining a business that pays its own way. An important part of this development was the launch of a new club crest. The crest was designed to combine elements of the past, present and future of the Club. The new crest features the famous blue and white hoops, which appeared on the Club’s badge before it was redesigned in the early 1980s. The change is to be representative of our aim to re-launch the Club into a global brand The key barometer of our success is the on-pitch performance and thus we intend to pursue a policy of investing surplus cash into team developmentDuring the summer transfer window, we took a prudent and measured approach to player signings by bringing in players through free transfers and loan deals, notably Kaspars Gorkss fromBlackpool, Samuel Di Carmine from Fiorentina, Emmanuel Ledesma fromGenoa, Daniel Parejo fromReal Madrid and Lee Cook fromFulham.These deals will allow QPR tomove towards our objective of ensuring that QPR is financially self-sustaining.Off the field, our season ticket sales for the 2008/09 season were extremely encouraging. In fact, we took the decision to cap season ticket numbers at 10,000 before the start of the season. We also launched a newmembership scheme which has gone extremely well and we plan to launch a new quarterlymagazine soon. Subsequent to the year-end, the ABC Corporation loan that attracted an interest rate of 11.76%was repaid and refinanced in July 2008 with a loan fromAmulya Property Limited, a company with which Amit Bhatia and I are connected. The interest rate under the Amulya Loan is 8.5%. The transformation in this Club since we completed the takeover has been immense. The changes to the Club have been very important and will allow us to ease our transition to the Premier League. I would like to pay tribute to the shareholders, fans and commercial partners for their continued support and dedication and I look forward to welcoming you to Loftus Road to what I hope will be a successful season.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:00:06 GMT
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Mr F Briatore Mr A Bhatia Mr A A Longo Mr G Paladini Mr G S Taylor Mr B T S Michel Mr M Rapini
COMPANY SECRETARY Temple Secretarial Limited REGISTERED OFFICE Loftus Road Stadium South Africa Road London W12 7PA AUDITOR Chantrey Vellacott DFK LLP Chartered Accountants Registered Auditor Russell Square House 10 - 12 Russell Square London WC1B 5LF
BANKERS Lloyds TSB 2nd Floor 25 GreshamStreet London EC2V 7HN The Royal Bank of Scotland 9-13 Paternoster Row London EC4M 7EG REGISTRARS Equiniti Aspect House Spencer Street Lancing West Sussex BN99 6DA SOLICITORS Withers LLP 16 Old Bailey London EC4M 7EG COMPANY REG 3197756
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:01:17 GMT
Page 4: The Financial Highlights.
Various charts
Wages shooting up
Loss going up
2008 2007 £000 £000
Group turnover 9,239 8,224 Group operating loss (6,072) (4,874) Loss before taxation (6,009) (4,729)
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:07:27 GMT
FINANCIAL REVIEW (page 9)
The financial year to 31 May 2008 marked a significant moment in Queens Park Rangers’ history. The Club was saved from certain administration by a consortium led by Flavio Briatore and Bernie Ecclestone. Following completion of the takeover in November 2007, the Club then secured an investment from the Mittal family.
The results for the year demonstrate that the benefits to materialise from the new ownership will take time to filter through. In summary:
• Group turnover exceeded £9.2 million, an increase of 12% on prior year, due mainly to an increase in broadcast and retail revenue;
• Match day revenue at £2.8 million, representing an average of £123k per Football League match played at Loftus Road, fell 12% on prior year due principally to match day ticket prices being reduced from an average of £25.00 in the prior year to £22.50 in the current year;
• Group operating losses exceeded £6.0 million, an increase of 27% on prior year reflecting the new owners’ pursuit of on-pitch success through investing heavily in the playing squad;
• At the balance sheet date the Group had bank reserves of £1.5 million, representing an increase of £1.2 million on the prior year;
• At the balance sheet date the Group has improved the deficit position from £3.8 million in the prior year to £0.2 million surplus this year.
2008 2007 £000 £000 GROUP TURNOVER 9,239 8,224 OPERATING LOSS (6,072) (4,874) OPERATING LOSS BEFORE EXCEPTIONAL ITEMS (10,222) (4,729) INTEREST PAYABLE (2,114) (1,467) LOSS FOR THE YEAR (6,009) (4,729) CAPITAL EXPENDITURE (6,125) 1,07
The keymeasure of the Club’s success is on-pitch performance and a critical driver of any club’s value is presence in the Premier League, which is the stated aimof the new ownership. The desire for on-pitch success and the intense competitive desire to seek promotion to the Premier League hasmeant the Club has invested significantly in the first team– payments to acquire player registrations increased from£0.4million in the prior year to £6.6million this year, a 1550% increase.
Income Group turnover for the year was £9.2 million (2007 – £8.2 million). Ticketing contributed 54% (2007 – 61%) to Group turnover in the current financial year, with broadcast contributing 21% (2007 – 13%), commercial revenue falling slightly at 18% (2007 – 21%) and other revenue contributing 6% (2007 – 7%).
Ticketing The decrease in turnover from £5.0 million in the prior year to £4.8 million in the current year was driven mainly by a reduction in match day ticket prices and season ticket prices at Loftus Road stadium, where the price of an average adult ticket was reduced from £25.00 to £22.50. The ‘buzz’ surrounding the new ownership possibly possibly helped increase the average attendance for the 23 Championship first team matches played from 12,920 to 13,594, a 5% increase.
There was also growth in the number of season ticket holders – from 6,738 in the prior year to 8,103 by the end of the current financial year, a 20% increase. Although the Club were knocked out of the Carling and FA Cup in the first and third round respectively, the draw in the FA Cup away against Chelsea helped boost revenue
As the above graph demonstrates, the stadium is clearly under-utilised and the aim is to gradually increase the percentage capacity. Over the previous 5 years, the stadium capacity percentage has fallen from a high of 83% in the 2004/05 season to 74% in the current financial year.
Broadcast The increase in Group turnover was driven mainly by an increase in broadcasting revenues, where revenue increased to £1.9 million (2007 – £1.0 million). The increase was due to the Football League solidarity payment made to all Championship clubs and the size of this payment is of course dependant on the teams promoted and relegated in any one year.
Retail Retail revenues increased by 108% to £0.7 million (2007 – £0.3 million) as a result of increased match attendance and partly revenue generated from new logo merchandise.
Commercial Commercial revenue (excluding retail) fell by 35% to £0.9 million (2007 – £1.4 million). The group was tied into many commercial agreements that represented poor value and a new strategy was put in place by the new ownership, the results of which will not filter through until next year.
Expenditure Expenditure has increased significantly from the prior year reflecting investment (salaries, signon and appearance fees) in the first team squad (including loan players) and two first team coaches as well as costs due to termination of existing commercial arrangements.
Cost of sales The Group’s cost of sales grew to £14.3 million (2007 – £9.6 million). Playing squad salaries increased by 43% as a result of 12 new players being brought in during the year in addition to 11 players on loan deals.
This was offset by savings made on 19 first team players being releasedfrom their contracts. Moreover, intangible asset amortisation grew significantly due to these additions to the squad. Football staff salaries also increased by 15% due to costs connected with termination of John Gregory and Luigi De Canio contracts.
Administrative expenses The Group’s administrative expenses grew to £5.9 million (2007 - £3.5 million). In order to support the growth of the business next year, the number of non-playing staff increased by 10 during the year and is expected to rise further.
In addition, the Group incurred significant oneoff legal and professional costs associated with completion of the takeover in November 2007. Moreover, the Group incurred one-off costs associated with termination of the existing shirt sponsor Car Giant and kit sponsors Le Coq Sportif.
Player trading A profit of £2.1 million was generated from the sale of player registrations (2007 – £1.6 million). This was principally as a result of the sale of Lee Cook to Fulham in August 2007. Lee Cook has, since the year-end, returned to Loftus Road on a permanent deal.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:10:56 GMT
Cash flow and treasury
Net cash outflow from operations amounted to £3.3 million as compared to £3.4 million for the previous year. The table below demonstrates how an increase in cash of £1.2 million arose:
2008 2007 £’000 £’000 Operations cash outflow (3,335) (3,369) Servicing of debt (2,072) (1,249) Capital expenditure (6,125) 1,070 Financing 12,763 4,127 Increase in cash 1,231 579
Subsequent to the year-end, the ABC loan that attracted an interest rate of 11.76% was repaid and refinanced with a loan from Amulya Property Limited, a company with which Flavio Briatore and Amit Bhatia, directors of the Group, are connected. The interest rate under the Amulya Loan is 8.5%. Despite this, the cost of servicing debt rose as the loans due to Sarita Capital Investments Inc, the majority shareholder, amounted to £8.6 million (2007 - £nil) whereby interest is payable at 7.0%.
During the year, the Group opened a high interest account with The Royal Bank of Scotland in February 2008 to take advantage of excess cash held by the Group – this has generated £42k in interest this year (2007 – £nil). We will continue to take advantage of excess cash held by the Group, using a mixture of short-term money market deposits and maintaining balances in the high interest account.
Additionally, the Group repaid £1.3 million in loans during the year, repaid significant taxation and trade creditor liabilities as well as making improvements to the level of stock holding and debtor collection process.
Net debt as at 31 May 2008 has increased to £19.9 million (2007 – £18.0 million).
Risks and uncertainties There are a number of potential risks and uncertainties that could have a material impact on the Group’s long term performance. These risks and uncertainties are monitored by the Board on a regular basis.
Football The Group’s income is directly affected by the performance of the first team. The sources and level of revenue generated by the Group has a direct relationship with the performance of the team in the Championship, the Carling Cup and the FA Cup.
It is important to note that 54% (2007 – 61%) of the Group’s revenue is derived from ticket sales. The level of attendance may be influenced by factors such as the success of the team, ticket prices, broadcast coverage and the general economic climate. The team in the current financial year performed better than in the prior year finishing 4 places higher in 14th, combined with a reduction in admission prices and interest from the new ownership helped increase average attendance by 5% during the year.
The Group is importantly dependant on the performance of the playing squad, as well as the football management staff. The strategy is to ensure we retain the highest quality playing staff by securing long-terms contracts. The Group operates in a highly competitive market for talent and the market rates for transfer and wages is to a varying degree dictated by competitors and the Group may follow this in order to maintain the strength of the first team.
The Club is regulated by the rules of the various governing bodies and any change to these rules could have an impact on the Group, especially the division of broadcasting income. The Group monitors its compliance with all applicable rules and considers the impact of any changes.
Commercial The Group derives income from sponsorship and other commercial arrangements. Going forward, the Group aims to enter into long-term arrangements with its key commercial partners thereby securing certainty of income in the medium term. Broadcasting and certain other revenues are derived from contracts that are currently centrally negotiated by the Football\
League; the Group does not have any influence on the outcome of the relevant contract negotiations.
Outlook The ‘credit crunch’ has led to a greater focus on balance sheets and debt servicing costs across all businesses. This has led the Group to assess various possibilities as to how it is financed over the short-to-medium term to ensure value is maximised for shareholders. We expect to primarily focus on the operational and commercial revenue generation aspects of the stadium and facilities.
Transfer activity over the summer months of 2008 saw a number of players come into the Club on a combination of free transfers and loan deals, notably Kaspars Gorkss from Blackpool, Samuel Di Carmine from Fiorentina, Emmanuel Ledesma from Genoa, Daniel Parejo from Real Madrid and Lee Cook from Fulham. In addition, Simon Walton and Chris Barker were sold to Plymouth Argyle and 6 players were released from their contracts.
The 2008/09 financial results will benefit from significant commercial contracts that have been signed. These include the new shirt sponsorship deal signed with Gulf Air, new kit sponsor Lotto and commercial partner deals with Santander and Chronotech. This will be offset by a fall in broadcasting revenue as a result of reduction in the solidarity payment, which is dependant on what clubs are relegated from the Premier League.
In terms of stadium development, there has been a significant spend on the corporate boxes, hospitality suites, ticket office, retail outlets and seating as well as improvement in the viewing experience through the jumbo screen and scoreboard.
Despite the revenue that we can expect to derive as a result of new commercial contracts, the Board continues to believe that the best long term policy for the Group is to re-invest cash back into the development of the team and key areas of the stadium. Accordingly, the Group’s business plan and budgets are prepared with this objective in mind.
Gavin Taylor Finance Director financial
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:15:27 GMT
DIRECTORS REPORT
(Page 18)
The directors present their report and the audited group financial statements for the year ended 31 May 2008. PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES AND BUSINESS REVIEW
The principal activity of the Group is the operation of a professional football club, with related commercial activities. These activities and performance are reported in the Chairman’s statement and within the financial statements.
The results for the year demonstrate that the benefits to materialise from the new ownership will take time to filter through. In summary:
• Group turnover exceeded £9.2 million, an increase of 12% on prior year, due mainly to an increase in broadcast and retail revenue;
• Match day revenue at £2.8 million, representing an average of £123k per Football League match played at Loftus Road, fell 12% on prior year due principally to match day ticket prices being reduced from an average of £25.00 in the prior year to £22.50 in the current year;
• Group operating losses exceeded £6.0 million, an increase of 27% on prior year reflecting the new owners’ pursuit of onpitch success through investing heavily in the playing squad;
• At the balance sheet date the Group had bank reserves of £1.5 million, representing an increase of £1.2 million on the prior year
At the balance sheet date the Group has improved the deficit position from £3.8 million in the prior year to £0.2 million surplus this year.
The key measure of the Club’s success is onpitch performance and a critical driver of any club’s value is presence in the Premier League, which is the stated aim of the new ownership. The desire for on-pitch success and the intense competitive desire to seek promotion to the Premier League has meant the Club has invested significantly in the first team.
CASH FLOW AND TREASURY
Net cash outflow from operations amounted to £3.3 million as compared to £3.4 million for the previous year.
Subsequent to the year-end, the ABC loan that attracted an interest rate of 11.76% was repaid and refinanced with a loan from Amulya Property Limited, a company with which Flavio Briatore and Amit Bhatia, directors of the Group, are connected. The interest rate under the Amulya Loan is 8.5%. Despite this, the cost of servicing debt rose as the loans due to Sarita Capital Investments Inc, the majority shareholder, amounted to £8.6 million (2007 - £nil) whereby interest is payable at 7.0%.
Additionally, the Group repaid £1.3 million in loans during the year, repaid significant taxation and trade creditor liabilities as well as making improvements to the level of stock holding and debtor collection process.
Net debt as at 31 May 2008 has increased to £19.6 million (2007 – £18.0 million). RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
There are a number of potential risks and uncertainties that could have a material impact on the Group’s long term performance. These risks and uncertainties are monitored by the Board on a regular basis.
FOOTBALL The Group’s income is directly affected by the performance of the first team. The sources and level of revenue generated by the Group has a direct relationship with the performance of the teamin the Championship, the Carling Cup and the FA Cup.
It is important to note that 54%(2007 – 61%) of the Group’s revenue is derived from ticket sales. The level of attendancemay be influenced by factors such as the success of the team, ticket prices, broadcast coverage and the general economic climate. The teamin the current financial year performed better than in the prior year finishing 4 places higher in 14th, combined with a reduction in admission prices and interest fromthe new ownership helped increase average attendance by 5%during the year.
The Group is importantly dependant on the performance of the playing squad, as well as the footballmanagement staff. The strategy is to ensure we retain the highest quality playing staff by securing long-terms contracts. The Group operates in a highly competitivemarket for talent and themarket rates for transfer and wages is, to a varying degree, dictated by competitors and the Groupmay be required to follow this in order to maintain the strength of the first team. The Club is regulated by the rules of the
various governing bodies and any change to these rules could have an impact on the Group, especially the division of broadcasting income. The Group monitors its compliance with all applicable rules and considers the impact of any changes.
COMMERCIAL The Group derives income from sponsorship and other commercial arrangements. Going forward, the Group aims to enter into long-term arrangements with its key commercial partners thereby securing certainty of income in the medium term.
Broadcasting and certain other revenues are derived from contracts that are currently centrally negotiated by the Football League; the Group does not have any influence on the outcome of the relevant contract negotiations.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS
The ‘credit crunch’ has led to a greater focus on the balance sheet and debt servicing costs across all businesses. This has led the Group to assess various possibilities as to how it is financed over the short-to-medium term to ensure value is maximised for shareholders. We expect to primarily focus on the operational and commercial revenue generation aspects of the stadium and facilities.
The 2008/09 financial results will benefit from significant commercial contracts that have
been signed. These include the new shirt sponsorship deal signed with Gulf Air, new kit sponsor Lotto and commercial partner deals with Santander and Chronotech. This will be offset by a fall in broadcasting revenue as a result of reduction in the solidarity payment, which is dependant on which clubs are relegated from the Premier League.
In terms of stadium development, there has been a significant spend on the corporate boxes, hospitality suites, ticket office, retail outlets and seating as well as improving in the viewing experience through the jumbo screen and scoreboard.
Despite the revenue that we can expect to derive as a result of new commercial contracts, the Board continues to believe that the best long term policy for the Group is to re-invest cash back into the development of the team and key areas of the stadium. Accordingly, the Group’s business plan and budgets are prepared with this objective in mind.
RESULTS AND DIVIDENDS The loss for the year amounted to £6,009,000 (2007 – loss £4,729,000). The directors have not recommended a dividend. DIRECTORS The directors who served the company during the year were as follows: Mr F Briatore appointed on 12 December 2007 Mr A Bhatia appointed on 19 December 2007
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:16:01 GMT
DIRECTORS' REPORT YEAR ENDED 31 MAY 2008 CONTINUED
Mr A A Longo appointed on 26 October 2007 Mr G Paladini appointed on 6 July 2005 Mr G S Taylor appointed on 26 October 2007 Mr B T S Michel appointed on 26 October 2007 Mr M Rapini appointed on 20 February 2008 Mr A Caliendo retired on 26 October 2007 Mr F Zanotti retired on 26 October 2007 Mr N De Marco appointed on 20 August 2007 Mr M Cooke appointed on 20 August 2007 Mr N De Marco and Mr M Cooke retired as directors on 20 August 2007.
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The group’s principal financial instruments comprise bank balances, bank overdrafts, trade creditors, trade debtors, shareholder and other loans. The main purpose of these instruments is to raise funds for the group’s operations and to finance the group’s operations.
Due to the nature of the financial instruments used by the group, there is no exposure to price risk. The group’s approach to managing other risks applicable to the financial instruments concerned is shown below.
Trade debtors are managed in respect of credit and cash flow risk by policies concerning the credit offered to customers and the regular monitoring of amounts outstanding for both time and credit limits.
Trade creditors liquidity risk ismanaged by ensuring sufficient funds are available tomeet amounts due.
Shareholder and other loans are managed by ensuring that sufficient funds are available to repay interest and capital sums as they fall due.
POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS The details of these are included in note 24 to the financial statements.
DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES The directors are responsible for preparing the annual report and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and regulations. Company law requires the directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law, the directors have elected to prepare the financial statements in accordance with United KingdomGenerally Accepted Accounting Practice (United KingdomAccounting Standards and applicable law). The financial statements are required by law to give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the company and the group and of the profit or loss of the group for that year. In preparing these financial statements, the directors are required to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; • make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent; • prepare the financial statements on going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the group will continue in business.
The directors are responsible for keeping proper accounting records that disclose, with reasonable accuracy, at any time the financial position of the group and enable themto ensure that the financial statements comply with the Companies Act 1985. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the group and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. Insofar as the directors are aware:
• there is no relevant audit information of which the group's auditor is unaware; and • the directors have taken all steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information and to establish that the auditor is aware of that information. AUDITOR
On 24 July 2008 Chantrey Vellacott DFK LLP were appointed as the company’s auditors. Signed by order of the directors Temple Secretarial Limited Company Secretary Approved by the directors on 11 March 2009
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:19:19 GMT
GROUP PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT
(Page 21)
2008 2007
GROUP TURNOVER 2 9,239 8,224 Cost of sales 14,064 9,588
GROSS LOSS (4,825) (1,364) Administrative expenses 5,460 3,510 Waiver of loan 3 (4,213) –
OPERATING LOSS 4 (6,072) (4,874) Profit on disposal of player's registrations 6 2,135 1,612 (3,937) (3,262) Interest receivable 7 42 – Interest payable and similar charges 8 (2,114) (1,467)
LOSS ON ORDINARY ACTIVITIES BEFORE TAXATION (6,009) (4,729) Taxation 9 - -
LOSS FOR THE FINANCIAL YEAR (6,009) (4,729) All of the activities of the group are classed as continuing. The group has no recognised gains or losses other than the results for the year as set out above. The company has taken advantage of section 230 of the Companies Act 1985 not to publish its own profit and loss account.w There is no difference between the results shown above and their historical cost equivalents.
GROUP BALANCE SHEET 2008 2007 Note £000 £000
FIXED ASSETS Intangible assets 10 6,247 635 Tangible assets 11 20,918 19,772 27,165 20,407
CURRENT ASSETS Stocks 13 38 146 Debtors 14 631 1,078 Cash at bank 1,536 305 2,205 1,529
CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUEWITHIN ONE YEAR 15 17926 8,584
NET CURRENT LIABILITIES (15,721) (7,055)
TOTAL ASSETS LESS CURRENT LIABILITIES 11,444 13,352 CREDITORS:
AMOUNTS FALLING DUE AFTERMORE THAN ONE YEAR 16 11,100 16,974 344 (3,622)
PROVISIONS FOR LIABILITIES Provisions for liabilities and charges 17 185 210 (159) (3,832)
CAPITAL AND RESERVES Called up equity share capital 20 11,000 1,000 Share premiumaccount 21 7,617 7,617 Revaluation reserve 21 10,085 10,085 Profit and loss account 21 (28,543) (22,534)
SURPLUS/DEFICIT 22 (159) (3,832) These financial statements were approved by the directors and authorized for issue on 11 March, and are signed on their behalf by: G Taylor 11 March 2009
CASH FLOWSTATEMENT 2008 2007 Note £000 £000
NET CASH OUTFLOWFROMOPERATING ACTIVITIES 23 (3,335) (3,369)
RETURNS ON INVESTMENTS AND SERVICING OF FINANCE 23 (2,072) (1,249)
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL INVESTMENT 23 (6,125) 1,070 CASH OUTFLOWBEFORE FINANCING (11,892) (3,548) FINANCING 23 12,763 4,127 INCREASE IN CASH 23 1,231 579 47 cash
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:20:29 GMT
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2. TURNOVER The turnover and loss before tax are attributable to the one principal activity of the group. An analysis of turnover is given below: 2008 2007 £000 £000
Match day receipts 4,696 5,008 Television andmedia 1,925 1,032 Sponsorship,merchandising and commercial 1,627 1,731 Other 991 453 Total 9,239 8,224
3. OTHER OPERATING INCOME 2008 2007 £000 £000 Waiver of loan 4,213 – On the 1 September 2007 Mr A Caliendo waived £4,212,882 of his loan owed to himby QPR Holdings Limited.
4. OPERATING LOSS Operating loss is stated after charging: 2008 2007 £000 £000 Amortisation 1,235 315 Depreciation of owned fixed assets 266 332 Auditor's remuneration 12 18 Operating lease rentals - Land and buildings 249 224 Loss attributable tomembers of the parent company The loss dealt with in the accounts of the parent company was £6,104,000 (2007 – loss £4,789,000).
5. DIRECTORS AND STAFF COSTS The remuneration of the directors was: 2008 2007 £000 £000
Directors Remuneration 174 140 Amounts paid to third parties in respect of directors services 75 74 249 214
The highest paid director received £196,670 during the year. The average number of staff, including executive directors, employed by the group during the financial year can be analysed as follows:
2008 2007 No No Administrative staff 11 13 Players,managers, coaches and support staff 68 54 Commercial,marketing and retail staff 11 10 Stadiumandmaintenance staff 7 5 Community projects 20 15 117 97 The aggregate payroll costs of the above were: 2008 2007 £000 £000
Wages and salaries 9,271 6,977 Social security costs 1,074 749 Other pension costs 53 6 10,398 7,732
11.TANGIBLE FIXED ASSETS Group Land & Plant & Fixtures & Stadium Buildings Machinery Fittings Improvements Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000
Cost or valuation At 1 June 2007 19,937 2,591 421 – 22,949 Additions – 109 13 1,290 1,412 At 31May 2008 19,937 2,700 434 1,290 24,361
Depreciation At 1 June 2007 217 2,539 421 – 3,177 Charge for the year 217 29 1 19 266 At 31May 2008 434 2,568 422 19 3,443 Net book value At 31May 2008 19,503 132 12 1,271 20,918 At 31 May 2007 19,720 52 – – 19,772 Company Land & Plant & Fixtures & Stadium Buildings Machinery Fittings Improvements Total £000 £000 £000 £000 £000 Cost or valuation At 1 June 2007 19,937 2,591 421 – 22,949 Additions – 109 13 1,290 1,412 At 31May 2008 19,937 2,700 434 1,290 24,361 Depreciation At 1 June 2007 217 2,539 421 – 3,177 Charge for the year 217 29 1 19 266 At 31May 2008 434 2,568 422 19 3,443 Net book value At 31May 2008 19,503 132 12 1,271 20,918 At 31 May 2007 19,720 52 – – 19,772 The Loftus Road Stadiumwas independently valued by Savills, Chartered Surveyors, as at 31 May 2006 on a depreciated replacement cost (existing use) basis. On a historical cost basis, land and buildings would have been included as follows for both the Group and the Company: 2008 2007 £000 £000 Original Cost 12,182 12,182 Depreciation based on cost (1,230) (1,108) 10,952 11,074
12.INVESTMENTS Company Group companies £000 Cost At 1 June 2007 and 31 May 2008 8,213 Net book value At 1 June 2007 and 31 May 2008 8,213 As at 31 May 2008 the company owned the following subsidiary undertakings: Proportion of voting rights Country of and shares incorporation Holding held Nature of business Subsidiary undertakings TheQueensPark Rangers Football and Provision of AthleticClub Limited England Ordinary shares 100% football teams
13.STOCKS Group Company 2008 2007 2008 2007 £000 £000 £000 £000 Goods for resale 38 146 38 146 14.DEBTORS Group Company 2008 2007 2008 2007 £000 £000 £000 £000 Trade debtors 175 471 89 471 Transfer debtor - 600 - - Other debtors 406 – 406 - Prepayments and accrued income 50 7 50 7 631 1,078 545 478
15.CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUEWITHIN ONE YEAR Group Company 2008 2007 2008 2007 £000 £000 £000 £000 Shareholders’ loan – 100 – 100 Other loans 10,000 1,264 10,000 500 Trade creditors 1,705 1,639 1,643 1,639 Transfer creditor 2,700 606 - - Amounts owed to group undertakings – - 8,351 14,915 Taxation and social security 733 3,768 78 403 Accruals and deferred income 2,788 1,207 2,975 1,176 17,926 8,584 23,047 18,733 Included in other loans:
A £10,000,000 loan fromABC Corporation, interest bearing at 11.76%, secured by way of fixed charge over the Loftus Road Stadium, which was repaid in July 2008. . This has been reclassified as amounts falling due in less than one year, in the year ending 31 May 2008, as it was repaid post year-end. (See Note 24)
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:24:30 GMT
16.CREDITORS: AMOUNTS FALLING DUE AFTERMORE THANONE YEAR Group Company 2008 2007 2008 2007 £000 £000 £000 £000 Other loans 11,100 16,974 11,100 16,974 Included within long termcreditors are the following unsecured convertible loans: A £8,600,000 loan fromSarita Capital Investments, interest bearing at 7% and is repayable on demand. A £500,000 loan fromValentin Ehmer, interest bearing at 8.72%and is repayable on 29 April 2010. A £2,000,000 (interest free) loan owing to Mr A Caliendo is repayable on 28 February 2011 and redeemable at any time prior to that date at the sole discretion of QPR. 17.PROVISIONS FOR LIABILITIES Group Company 2008 2007 2008 2007 £000 £000 £000 £000 Provision for liabilities and charges 185 210 - - The provision of £185,000 relates to taxes due to H M Customs & Excise on player benefits and Ian Holloway image rights. 18.COMMITMENTS As at 31 May 2008 the company was committed to paying £249,924 (2007: £232,000) per annum under a non-cancellable operating lease in relation to land and buildings. The lease expires 30 June 2010. 19.RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS During the year, the company paid consultancy fees amounting to £75,000 (2007: £73,750) to Moorbound Ltd, a company in which O Paladini, the wife of G Paladini, a director, is the only shareholder. In addition the company provided an interest free loan of £140,000 (2007: £nil) to G Paladini. On 7 November 2007, 500,000,000 1p ordinary shares were issued at par to Sarita Capital Investments Inc, a shareholder of QPR Holdings Limited. This was in relation to a loan conversion. On the 18 March 2008 the following shares were issued: 26,343,520 1p shares to F Briatore, a director of QPR Holdings Limited 105,374,967 1p shares to Sea DreamLimited, a shareholder of QPR Holdings Limited 289,251,843 1p shares to Sarita Capital Investments Inc, a shareholder of QPR Holdings Limited During the year Sarita Capital Investments Inc, has also provided funding of £8.6m(see note 16).
20.SHARE CAPITAL Authorised share capital: 2008 2007 £000 £000 16,000,000,000 Ordinary shares of 1p each 16,000 1,000 Allotted, called up and fully paid: 2008 2007 No £000 No £000 Ordinary shares of 1p each 1,100,000,000 11,000 100,000,000 1,000 On the 15 November 2007, the company's authorised share capital was increased to 16,000,000,000 of 1p shares. On that date 500,000,000 shares of 1p each were issued. On the 18 March 2008, the company's authorised share capital was increased to 16,000,000,000 of 1p shares. On that date 500,000,000 shares of 1p each were issued. In addition on 16 June 2008, 500,000,000 shares of 1p each were issued. 21.RESERVES Group Share premium Revaluation Profit and loss account reserve reserve £000 £000 £000 Balance brought forward 7,617 10,085 (25,534) Loss for the year – – (6,009) Balance carried forward 7,617 10,085 (28,543) Company Share premium Revaluation Profit and loss account reserve account £000 £000 £000 Balance brought forward 7,617 10,085 (25,495) Loss for the year – – (6,104) Balance carried forward 7,617 10,085 (31,599) 22.RECONCILIATION OF MOVEMENTS IN SHAREHOLDERS' FUNDS 2008 2007 £000 £000 Loss for the financial year (6,009) (4,729) New ordinary share capital subscribed 10,000 – Net addition to shareholders' (deficit)/funds 3,991 (4,729) Opening shareholders' (deficit)/funds (3,832) 897 Closing shareholders' surplus/deficit 159 (3,832)
23.NOTES TO THE STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS Reconciliation of operating loss to net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities 2008 2007 £000 £000 Operating loss (6,072) (4,874) Amortisation 1,235 315 Depreciation 266 332 Decrease in stocks 108 108 Decrease/(increase) in debtors 477 (142) Increase in creditors 681 892 Net cash outflow fromoperating activities (3,335) (3,369) Returns on investments and servicing of finance 2008 2007 £000 £000 Interest received 42 – Interest paid (2,114) (1,249) Net cash outflow fromreturns on investments and servicing of finance (2,072) (1,249) Capital expenditure 2008 2007 £000 £000 Payments to acquire player registrations (6,904) (472) Payments to acquire tangible fixed assets (1,412) (3) Receipts fromsale of player registrations 2,191 1,545 Net cash outflow fromcapital expenditure (6,125) 1,070 Financing 2008 2007 £000 £000 Debts due within one year New unsecured loan - 233 New secured loan - 500 Repayment of unsecured loan (1,363) (266) Debts due beyond a year New secured loan 8,339 3,830 Repayments (4,213) (210) Issue of equity share capital 10,000 - 12,763 4,127 Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt 2008 2007 £000 £000 Increase in cash in the period 1,231 579 Cash inflow fromincrease in debt financing (2,763) (4,127) Change in net debt resulting fromcash flows (1,532) (3,548) Non-cash increase in capital element of shareholders loan - (365) Movement in net debt in period (1,532) (3,913) Net debt at 1 June 2007 (18,032) (14,120) Net debt at 31 May 2008 (19,564) (18,033) Analysis of changes in net debt At At 1 Jun 2007 Cash flows 31May 2008 £000 £000 £000 Net cash: Cash in hand and at bank 305 1,231 1,536 Debt: Debt due after 1 year (16,974) (4,126) (21,000) Debt due within one year (1,363) 1,363 - Net debt (18,032) (1,532) (19,564)
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jun 27, 2009 19:24:52 GMT
24.POST BALANCE SHEET EVENTS
Subsequent to the year-end, the ABC loan that attracted an interest rate of 11.76%was repaid and refinanced with a loan fromAmulya Property Limited, a company with which Flavio Briatore and Amit Bhatia, directors of the Group, are connected. The interest rate under the Amulya Loan is 8.5%.
The Group issued a further 500,000,000 shares of 1p each to fromexistingmajority shareholders in June 2008 raising £5million. This increased the issued share capital from £11million to £16million.
Transfer activity over the summermonths of 2008 saw a number of players join the Club on a combination of free transfers and loan deals, notably Kaspars Gorkss from Blackpool, Samuel Di Carmine fromFiorentina, Emmanuel Ledesma fromGenoa, Daniel Parejo fromReal Madrid and Lee Cook fromFulham.
In addition, SimonWalton and Chris Barker were sold to Plymouth Argyle and 6 players were released fromtheir contracts.
In October 2008, the Club gave notice to terminate the employment of first teamcoach, Iain Dowie. Gareth Ainsworth was appointed as Caretaker Manager.
In terms of stadiumdevelopment, there has been a significant spend on the corporate boxes, hospitality suites, ticket office, retail outlets and seating as well as improving the viewing experience through the jumbo screen and scoreboard.
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Jun 27, 2009 22:59:49 GMT
Magnificent work Mike. So more loss less attendance, loan paid off then replaced. 2004-5 11th place 2008-9 11th place. But debt for now, is growing but underwritten,for now. As I can see thats all we gained.,not minimizing it though. Is this the right thread to post, if not will move, sorry.
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Jun 27, 2010 6:35:16 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Jun 27, 2010 6:36:02 GMT
So I suppose the latest set of accounts (which were noted a few months ago) - with the 19 million pound loss - should be officially released soon
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Jun 27, 2012 7:11:26 GMT
Still makes interesting reading (to me at least!)
|
|
ingham
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,896
|
Post by ingham on Jun 29, 2012 9:52:49 GMT
Interesting always how money flows out of the Club and into other people's pockets. That's what the losses mean.
The cost of buying the Club is paid for by the Club. The cost of signing players is met by the Club. The Ground is turned into cash to pay off chairmen. Wright pocketed the £10 million ABC loan cash. Ecclestone & Co made £40 million for themselves losing £25 million of the Club's money. In fact, more, wasn't it?
But the myth of 'investment', of money coming into the Club, continues.
English football is a closed system. If ten times more money is spent, ten times more teams don't win the title. The Clubs are always ranked 1-92 or whatever it is, and we know that before any season starts.
For the SUCCESSFUL Clubs to sign better players makes sense. They have more money, and are more attractive. But the UNsuccessful Clubs spend more, too. Not on the basis that they know what they're doing, but because they don't.
This is not a recipe for sound finances.
And it doesn't work. It can't. Notoriously struggling sides won't get the best players, even if they enjoy a brief day in the sun, as they used to do sometimes, but never manage to do now.
For each movement upwards, there is another downwards. Fine, if the Clubs weren't connected to each other. But they all sign the other Clubs' players, appoint the other Clubs'managers, money passes between them all the time, so someone else's failure affects us, just as their success brings us bigger crowds - or higher ticket prices - when they turn up at LR.
But the losses are always much greater. We are always far less talented than our spending. This means, for practical purposes, that we are stupid. Because it is easy to increase the wages of useless players, but impossible to increase their talent - what exactly ARE coaches and managers paid for, precisely? - investors take the easy way out to give an IMPRESSION that something is happening, the player equivalent of 'new ground syndrome'. Moving to a new ground doesn't make any difference, but it is confusing, and the more confusion there is, the better.
As we discover when we try to make the numbers add up to something sensible, and try to match increasing losses with the investors' claims that things are getting better.
Other Clubs' failure affects us in the long run. They outbid us in the transfer market, buying crap that leaves us only the crap that other incompetents don't want. Isn't that the case? And pushing up the price to stratospheric levels.
Provided Clubs spend in proportion to the success they will achieve, it will all add up. If we lose money, provided we have lost £25 million and make a £25 million profit the next year, we're all right.
And when does that happen? Loss follows loss follows loss.
But why wouldn't it? The more losses, the more the Club's money flows into other people's pockets. Why wait until the Club earns a little more anyway? The sums are miniscule by comparison with the losses, and profits non-existent.
If the losers who have been running the Club for decades had to line their own pockets from the PROFITS they made for QPR, the Club would be healthy, and they'd be confined to the dustbin of history where they belong.
A sobering comparison is with the football authorities, who let the moneylenders run amok on the basis that this will give us a better England team. The result? As far as I can make out, the worst England side ever.
Oh, they still run around enthusiastically. And practise missing penalties until they can do it in their sleep.
Why, just out of interest, is it courageous for a player who doesn't think he can take a penalty successfully - and who, by his own admission, is actually too FRIGHTENED to score (because it is all a matter of nerves, and as we miss them so often, we clearly don't have the bottle to take them), why is it admirable for that dope to VOLUNTEER to do so?
Stupid, certainly. A player who doesn't suffer from nerves - or, more likely, who can be nervous and STILL score (because he has the technique to do so) - yes. Volunteer, mate.
But why do the other berks go up? Is it because they've already provided their excuse, and that excuse has been accepted. No-one says 'don't miss, mate, or your name will be MUD'. Don't volunteer if you don't know what you're doing.
They don't have the bottle to tell them. To say 'if you're frightened, dearie, stay here'. Let someone take them who can cope. Are the naughty supporters shouting? Or quiet? That's even worse. How could anyone score with noise. Or silence. In the heat. Or cold.
How do we get knocked out on penalties then?
But everyone says how brave they are. Not their fault. WHOSE IS IT THEN? Martin Bormann's?
We know, don't we. Hodgson knows. The brave heroes will stand by bravely saying nothing, bravely not volunteering to get the boot, when HE loses HIS job because THEY can't do it.
Oh, well done Italy. Scored a few penalties, too. Although only against England. And - for once - haha - weren't depressingly dirty, cynical or defensive. Delightful, and Balotelli particularly. What a guy. Tough but not dirty, I thought. Tried hard, very hard, but didn't blame the defenders, didn't fall over, pretend he was hit in the face when he got it on the leg, didn't blame the ref, scream or whine even when his best efforts wouldn't go in.
Good luck to the guy.
And I LOVED his little smile before the penalty. Wasn't pleased it went in, but I do still like to see England win.
Even when they're too frightened to do so.
|
|
|
Post by Bushman on Jun 29, 2012 10:04:22 GMT
Interesting always how money flows out of the Club and into other people's pockets. That's what the losses mean. The cost of buying the Club is paid for by the Club. The cost of signing players is met by the Club. The Ground is turned into cash to pay off chairmen. Wright pocketed the £10 million ABC loan cash. Ecclestone & Co made £40 million for themselves losing £25 million of the Club's money. In fact, more, wasn't it? But the myth of 'investment', of money coming into the Club, continues. English football is a closed system. If ten times more money is spent, ten times more teams don't win the title. The Clubs are always ranked 1-92 or whatever it is, and we know that before any season starts. For the SUCCESSFUL Clubs to sign better players makes sense. They have more money, and are more attractive. But the UNsuccessful Clubs spend more, too. Not on the basis that they know what they're doing, but because they don't. This is not a recipe for sound finances. And it doesn't work. It can't. Notoriously struggling sides won't get the best players, even if they enjoy a brief day in the sun, as they used to do sometimes, but never manage to do now. For each movement upwards, there is another downwards. Fine, if the Clubs weren't connected to each other. But they all sign the other Clubs' players, appoint the other Clubs'managers, money passes between them all the time, so someone else's failure affects us, just as their success brings us bigger crowds - or higher ticket prices - when they turn up at LR. But the losses are always much greater. We are always far less talented than our spending. This means, for practical purposes, that we are stupid. Because it is easy to increase the wages of useless players, but impossible to increase their talent - what exactly ARE coaches and managers paid for, precisely? - investors take the easy way out to give an IMPRESSION that something is happening, the player equivalent of 'new ground syndrome'. Moving to a new ground doesn't make any difference, but it is confusing, and the more confusion there is, the better. As we discover when we try to make the numbers add up to something sensible, and try to match increasing losses with the investors' claims that things are getting better. Other Clubs' failure affects us in the long run. They outbid us in the transfer market, buying crap that leaves us only the crap that other incompetents don't want. Isn't that the case? And pushing up the price to stratospheric levels. Provided Clubs spend in proportion to the success they will achieve, it will all add up. If we lose money, provided we have lost £25 million and make a £25 million profit the next year, we're all right. And when does that happen? Loss follows loss follows loss. But why wouldn't it? The more losses, the more the Club's money flows into other people's pockets. Why wait until the Club earns a little more anyway? The sums are miniscule by comparison with the losses, and profits non-existent. If the losers who have been running the Club for decades had to line their own pockets from the PROFITS they made for QPR, the Club would be healthy, and they'd be confined to the dustbin of history where they belong. Cheered me up no end.
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Jun 30, 2013 8:30:15 GMT
Bump... 4 Years Jun 28, 2009 at 7:23am WMIPSFSQuote Edit like Post Options Post by QPR Report on Jun 28, 2009 at 7:23am Group operating losses exceeded £6.0 million, an increase of 27% on prior year Net debt as at 31 May 2008 has increased to £19.9 million (2007 – £18.0 million). The Group’s administrative expenses grew to £5.9 million (2007 - £3.5 million). In order to support the growth of the business next year, the number of non-playing staff increased by 10 during the year and is expected to rise further. Football staff salaries also increased by 15% due to costs connected with termination of John Gregory and Luigi De Canio contracts." Other loans 11,100 16,974 11,100 16,974 Included within long termcreditors are the following unsecured convertible loans: A £8,600,000 loan fromSarita Capital Investments, interest bearing at 7% and is repayable on demand. A £500,000 loan fromValentin Ehmer, interest bearing at 8.72%and is repayable on 29 April 2010. A £2,000,000 (interest free) loan owing to Mr A Caliendo is repayable on 28 February 2011 and redeemable at any time prior to that date at the sole discretion of QPR. The highest paid director received £196,670 during the year. During the year, the company paid consultancy fees amounting to £75,000 (2007: £73,750) to Moorbound Ltd, a company in which O Paladini, the wife of G Paladini, a director, is the only shareholder. In addition the company provided an interest free loan of £140,000 (2007:£nil) to G Paladini. Read more: qprreport.proboards.com/thread/4685?page=1#ixzz2XgbvbjOO
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Jun 28, 2014 9:25:21 GMT
Bump..5 Years ago
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Jul 2, 2014 7:18:14 GMT
And from 7 Years ago: I used to be (justly, I think) fairly critical of QPR Under Paladini - and under Briatore...But the losses then compared to recent years, pale into (virtual Insignificance)... We'll see what the Accounts this coming May and the following year show And 7 Years ago (+ a few days) QPR for Sale....We just don't have enough cash to take QPR forward Jun 25 2007 - David McIntyre/Ealing GazetteCHAIRMAN Gianni Paladini insists QPR will not be bought on the cheap despite the club's Italian owners being willing to relinquish control. Paladini last week declared that he and major shareholder Antonio Caliendo would seek only the money they paid for their shares when they acquired stakes in the club. That would mean around £650,000 would be required to purchase Paladini's shareholding and around £4million to take overall control of the club. But Paladini has warned that simply writing out a cheque for those amounts will not be enough. He said: "The offer is there for anyone who can take the club forward. I will only want what I paid for my shares. CHAIRMAN Gianni Paladini insists QPR will not be bought on the cheap despite the club's Italian owners being willing to relinquish control. Paladini last week declared that he and major shareholder Antonio Caliendo would seek only the money they paid for their shares when they acquired stakes in the club. That would mean around £650,000 would be required to purchase Paladini's shareholding and around £4million to take overall control of the club. But Paladini has warned that simply writing out a cheque for those amounts will not be enough. He said: "The offer is there for anyone who can take the club forward. I will only want what I paid for my shares. "But it has to be on condition that they have serious money to invest and can show they can move QPR to the next level. "We're a club that can compete in the Championship and if someone can take QPR further than that, then there is no way we would stand in their way. "I would leave tomorrow for the price I paid for my shares if that kind of person wanted the club. I would want any other money they had to go into QPR." Paladini added: "The vultures are circling. That always happens with QPR. But we're not saying we will sell to anyone. It has to be the right people. "We're committed to the club, we just realise we don't have the money to take it further and want others to come in and either help us or take over the club." A number of parties have expressed an interest including an Israeli group fronted by former Tottenham and Liverpool striker Ronnie Rosenthal, which has failed to prove it has sufficient funds. And a consortium has this week been discussing approaching the club with an offer. But at this stage the most likely addition to the Rangers board is Bill Power - the former chairman who was booted out by Paladini and Caliendo in 2005 following a bitter battle for control. Power has invested in Swindon since his public fall-out with Paladini and has been involved in a takeover bid for the Wilt-shire club. But the pair have recently rebuilt bridges and Paladini believes Power may return. "The door is open for Bill," said Paladini. "I don't think he wants to buy the club but the opportunity is there, if he wants it, to come back and work with me." Bar an angry exchange with disenchanted club president Harold Winton and a couple of questions about ongoing financial concerns, Paladini and other directors were given a fairly easy ride at last week's annual general meeting of shareholders. It was confirmed that Rangers made a loss of £3.3million in 2006 - up from £2.6m the previous year. A loss of around £2.6m for 2007 is predicted.
|
|