|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 19, 2009 8:43:50 GMT
Yes and we lost and Ainsworth withdrew a striker for and attacking midfielder, actually have we won playing 442 this season? I know we went 442 late against Wednesday but Vine still played behind Helguson.....the club will be making no further statement.
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 19, 2009 9:11:15 GMT
eusabio you dont have to remind me that in any vote on top poster i have always ...won except when you pipped me on the WATRBs SO IM A BIT FRIGHTENED TO TAKE YOU ON but we know im a game geezer so lets bring it on when ever you want it baby im here
for the one hundredth time all attacks have to be started from your defence football is all about out numbering the midfield and over running them creating chances
paulo sousa knew nothing about football
he was absolutely useless
he tried to play exactly the team that dowie had failed with
if he had played leighterwood as an attacking right back and eiphram as an attacking left back we would have hit the play offs
pete often tells people that hes has inside info
which is fair enough but i also have inside info and i can tell you in training he often played fitz hall as a striker
but he didnt have the courage to try fitz out in a proper game
EUSABIO LOVE YOU MAN BECAUSE YPOU CARE BUT THIS SOUSA THING HAS RUN ITS COURSE WHETHER WE LIOKE IT OR NOT LETS GET BEHIND THE TEAM THE WAR IS OVER WE ARE GOING UP UP UP AND WE ARE GOING TO WIN THE CUP
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 19, 2009 9:50:49 GMT
Dear Dex....you certainly have your moments but irrelevant of whether Sousa is gone or not the battle for the soul of this club is on going
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 19, 2009 10:12:58 GMT
In passing: I believe Weavie's WATRB ban is lifted. Look forward to Dexter for England as strongly advocating for and defening QPR Report on the WATRB site, as he has for Pete over here!
|
|
ingham
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,896
|
Post by ingham on Apr 19, 2009 11:39:51 GMT
If you have the right man, he will use the right system. It may be the system that best suits him, or his players, or the Club, but the only characteristic it will share with other successful systems will be that it works.
Focusing on the system itself doesn't tell us much, because there are 91 losers and only 1 winner, and each of the losers is trying every system in turn.
So every system - like anything else in football - is far more prone to failure than success.
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on Apr 19, 2009 11:55:08 GMT
If you have the right man, he will use the right system. It may be the system that best suits him, or his players, or the Club, but the only characteristic it will share with other successful systems will be that it works. Focusing on the system itself doesn't tell us much, because there are 91 losers and only 1 winner, and each of the losers is trying every system in turn. So every system - like anything else in football - is far more prone to failure than success. Okay......... 2 quick questions: Given the players at our disposal and taking our next opponents into account, bearing mind we are playing at home, what what would be our best formation and with which players, in your opinion?
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 19, 2009 12:37:07 GMT
If you have the right man, he will use the right system. It may be the system that best suits him, or his players, or the Club, but the only characteristic it will share with other successful systems will be that it works. Focusing on the system itself doesn't tell us much, because there are 91 losers and only 1 winner, and each of the losers is trying every system in turn. So every system - like anything else in football - is far more prone to failure than success. I think you're right...the system is irrelevant as long as you commit to it and build for it which makes it even more preposterous that the such a fuss is made of it by Mr B
|
|