|
Post by blockhead on Apr 9, 2009 19:55:12 GMT
Okay so the club have sacked PS for divulging secrets to a third party, how then are the clubs legal team going to prove that? I am sure that I read on the internet that Blackstock was moved to forest without PS knowledge long before the rebuttal came out, I fact I think he was quoted as knowing about it at the time. And it seems that is what the fuss is about, according to sky pundit Francis this evening. Now I don't care who's got their arm up who's back (because that's what I think), however this sounds very very costly to the club therefore to our club. Its silly that some secrets are in the public domain and some are not, but that is the way of the world and that is real polotik as they used to say. I am glad I will never be in the know cos if I did I reckon I would have someone's arm up my back and my hand on the bible in the dock. give people enough rope and all that.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 9, 2009 19:58:07 GMT
And Blackstock's departure: So Sousa says he didn't know. Either that was true. Big deal he revealed. Or as Pete was trying to prove. Hmm Pete: It wasn't true and Sousa had known. Either way: TO axe him over that . Yes right. Absolutely
|
|