|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 7, 2009 19:26:47 GMT
Lord Haw Haw continues his attacks on PS, but Gianni never taken a "margin" on any player transfer |
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on Apr 7, 2009 19:30:59 GMT
confused?
|
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 7, 2009 20:03:36 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on Apr 7, 2009 20:07:14 GMT
I missed that specific bit. If i'd have seen it i would have deleted it... bang out of order. |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 7, 2009 20:08:32 GMT
I saw that. Either what Pete says is true or untrue. If it were to be true, makes you wonder - yet again - who on earth would be passing on that confidential club information. Violating it might seem, certain ethics or beyond.
|
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on Apr 7, 2009 20:11:18 GMT
I saw that. Either what Pete says is true or untrue. If it were to be true, makes you wonder - yet again - who on earth would be passing on that confidential club information. Violating it might seem, certain ethics or beyond. Whether true or not. It's a very serious allegation that has no place on any messageboard IMHO. I'm going to delete it now. Apologies. |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 9, 2009 16:12:39 GMT
I referred to this claim by Pete on the dot.org. He of course never responded. But as I said, and say again. I'm assuming Pete didn't just make it up. If he did (which I would strongly doubt), then shame on Pete. If he didn't then Where did Pete come up with information if not from a source inside the club. Super unprofessional.
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 12:20:42 GMT
I asked Pete on LFW today. He again refused to answer. I guess the next step is self evident.
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 13:28:27 GMT
Mike reading that stuff makes me gag.
|
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 11, 2009 13:39:24 GMT
It seems that now Pete has only ever offered an opinion, he know no facts that emanate from within the club and GP is a trappist  |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 13:39:55 GMT
And on his site, he's stifling people who are asking that and similar questions. And refusing to answer re leaks to WATRB people from the club.
(As I just posted elsewhere, of course the REAL scandal is if confidential information was leaked by a QPR Official, then surely that official should be treated in exactly the same way that Sousa was for supposedly disclosing confidential information. If there's a difference, I don't understand what that is.
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 13:44:21 GMT
Well Said Mike.
Could there also be a case for Paladini openly cursing Sousa down about the subs outside the springbok - just before Oliveria was sacked & rumours of Sousa going....?
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 13:46:19 GMT
It seems that now Pete has only ever offered an opinion, he know no facts that emanate from within the club and GP is a trappist Eus - when I read his stuff its like listening to the thickest idiot you would ever meet trying to talk intelligently about politics or evolution ... go figure. |
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 11, 2009 13:52:42 GMT
Oh on top of that we should all get behind Ainsworth & the team, just like he did with Sousa & the team, hey but its just an opinion
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 13:54:18 GMT
lol - I'm just following the flow, Gareth did alright before (opinion)
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 13:56:35 GMT
I'd disagree how Ainsworth did. Had a bounce then declined.
I just reread THAT Post. It just doesn't seem that bad what Sousa supposedly said. Even if he really did speak; and really did say exactly that. OK maybe indiscrete. But nothing in my opinion more than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 13:59:01 GMT
Sousa's Opinion is worth more than a QPR fans imho.
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 14:05:05 GMT
It's lucky UK haven't got the fall back to constitional rights, like Americans have.
Example
Personal Liberty !
(7) To communicate with the world.
(8) To express or publish one's opinions or those of others.
(11) To enjoy privacy in all matters in which the rights of others are not violated.[7]
|
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 11, 2009 14:06:26 GMT
Leaks are endemic at QPR and GP is very indiscreet so whether he said it or not isn't the issue its consistency, people were openly quoting the fee for Blackstock on WATRBs, so is that not sensitive, is that not confidential and commercial?
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 14:19:55 GMT
Leaks are endemic at QPR and GP is very indiscreet so whether he said it or not isn't the issue its consistency, people were openly quoting the fee for Blackstock on WATRBs, so is that not sensitive, is that not confidential and commercial? But hasn't it built its reputation from day one with Pete providing the sauce ! Paladini & Nico providing scraps of food ! so they can feed watrb fans, its a community site & no one who comes goes away hungry, a modern day internet soup kitchen. at least thats the way I see it, opinion ! |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 14:23:12 GMT
I think one undeniable attraction of WATRB and one reason it grew so much (and so many of us visited even if we didn't like what Pete said) was that this site did have access to inside info/Was ITK re some. (ANd that's why I defended WATRB on other boards when they were disparaging it as "Fantasy Island) - Precisely cos I did acknowledge did have some ITK.
Now other stuff was crap: And definite incomings - such as Ben Watson - of course, was not quite so definite
|
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 11, 2009 14:29:13 GMT
Leaks are endemic at QPR and GP is very indiscreet so whether he said it or not isn't the issue its consistency, people were openly quoting the fee for Blackstock on WATRBs, so is that not sensitive, is that not confidential and commercial? But hasn't it built its reputation from day one with Pete providing the sauce ! Paladini & Nico providing scraps of food ! so they can feed watrb fans, its a community site & no one who comes goes away hungry, a modern day internet soup kitchen. at least thats the way I see it, opinion ! And I have no real problem with that philosophy but the hypocrisy of the statements by the Rumour Peddler in Chief about Sousa crimes are unbelievable......physician, heal thy self Luke 4:23 |
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 14:29:51 GMT
I have to agree somewhat with your synopsis of watrb.
I thought the best one to date - was the Briatore Interview !
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 14:32:35 GMT
But hasn't it built its reputation from day one with Pete providing the sauce ! Paladini & Nico providing scraps of food ! so they can feed watrb fans, its a community site & no one who comes goes away hungry, a modern day internet soup kitchen. at least thats the way I see it, opinion ! And I have no real problem with that philosophy but the hypocrisy of the statements by the Rumour Peddler in Chief about Sousa crimes are unbelievable......physician, heal thy self Luke 4:23 I was thinking more of a couple of the cardinal virtues ; ) |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 14:33:36 GMT
... I thought the best one to date - was the Briatore Interview ! Maybe Like Martin Peters, they were just "ten years ahead of their time!"  |
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 14:36:25 GMT
... I thought the best one to date - was the Briatore Interview ! Maybe Like Martin Peters, they were just "ten years ahead of their time!" ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Apr 11, 2009 14:40:51 GMT
Mike, wonder if we can do a memorial thread for the famed watrb Briatore interview from dot.org, must of been one of the most embarrassing qpr fans moments.
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 14:53:34 GMT
Anyone have a copy of it? (I guess I could look: It was Oct or Nov or Dec 2007?
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2010 17:04:40 GMT
A year ago today.... Plus ca change, plus c'est la meme chose
|
|
