|
|
Post by QPR Report on Oct 28, 2008 22:40:43 GMT
- After the past two results? I'm obviously torn. But ultimately, I'd still go for the experienced professional manager, with Ainsworth as his Assistant. But maybe wait a couple more weeks and see how Ainsworth is doing.  [Added a two seperate question poll; not sure how two questions will work out!] |
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on Oct 28, 2008 23:09:09 GMT
4 very good points but we still need a manager.
Obviously with a 10 man victory over arguably the best team in the league I'm happy at the moment but I hope we appoint a quality manager/coach.
Come on Flav, give Steve Clarke a call and make him an offer he can't refuse.
|
|
|
|
Post by moriarty on Oct 28, 2008 23:17:03 GMT
Why try and fix what ain't broke
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Oct 29, 2008 6:22:42 GMT
Pros and Cons (which could be added to both pros and cons)
Why not: Possibly because
- New manager bounce.
- Having a Chairman involved like this can't work out.
Belief that being a manager/First Team Coach is a job that requires real training; not suitable for a neophyte, no matter how talented.
And a belief that this will end in tears and Ainsworth will move on.
Pros:
It seems to be working
It worked at Sunderland: He took over and up
Maybe Ainsworth is the exception that works
|
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Oct 29, 2008 11:40:09 GMT
I voted for give him more time. a) because I think we should. b) so that each option had 1 vote each  |
|
