|
Post by QPR Report on Jan 9, 2010 10:59:15 GMT
From a post by Pete on LFW (Funky: There seems to be a very strong anti-Paladini thread there, in case you're interested")"...WATRB's was setup after the takeover, because I believed it was positive that Flavio had take over. Think everyone felt positive?? If you remember I kept having arguments (still do) on the negative slant on the club, but I sat in the office with MYU that week, when I knew about the takeover, then decided to start up the site. Its been hard work to build up the site, but when it first started we simply had Isleworth, Funky and a couple of others. Yes, it was a publicity stunt regards the Flavio interview, because anyone starting a new web-site needs people talking about it, and thats what happened. If I was so friendly with the heirachy at the club, then I could not have got away with it. That was a little over 2 years ago...." www.clubfanzine.com/QPR/v2.forum.posts.php?id_t=134948&page_no=12 There are quite a number of QPR messageboards out there. I'm only aware of one that made up something to promote their site.
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on Jan 9, 2010 13:12:18 GMT
Yes, it was a publicity stunt regards the Flavio interview, because anyone starting a new web-site needs people talking about it, and thats what happened Oh thats OK then. As long as you have an excuse it's perfectly OK to lie to fellow QPR supporters for your own selfish wants (not needs). In other words if the number of hits goes down on that website then it is perfectly acceptable to lie to other fans as the number of people who visit the site is far more important than actually being honest with the fan base. If the tenet is we only lied a couple of times and therefore it's OK, then it's perfectly reasonable and I would say seemingly obvious to assume that lies are used all the time on that site to keep up the number of hits and simply excuse themselves with 'it's a rumours site'. Sorry QBP but as a fellow QPR supporter I, at the very least, expect you would have the respect not to lie to me and to see your admission that you did so in order to fulfill your selfish egotistical wants (again not needs) in running a QPR website then I have to ask: At what point does the importance of the amount of site visitors become more so than the truth? What are your real intentions behind the website, because if it was to supply the fanbase with an honest opinion from a website of integrity why would you lie to us from the beginning? If you had half the integrity you seem to imply in your rebuttal posts you would have issued a retraction and an apology instead of trying to mug us off (as a direct result of your lies). Those are questions for you to think about as I do not want to read anything you write again ever. Here's a truthful statement for you: You are a dishonest liar whose words can never be trusted, from your own admission.
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Jan 9, 2010 13:47:36 GMT
Well I know that you haven't taken a leaf out of Pete's book Mike.
What gets me is the ego of Pete in the aftermath of the Briatore Interview Fiasco. He & his sucking buddies knew it was a outright lie. Admitted 2 years on to the general public but we already knew it was a lie. I wonder if alot more QPR fans will start to wake up to the utter trash thats being spewed from that site on a daily basis.
also that link ... great post from nathan..
|
|
|
Post by awrightmush on Jan 9, 2010 13:52:15 GMT
the truth is mark, they dont give a stuff about QPR or our fans. they only appeared when paladini turned up. they are agitators who would do anything for a free ticket and a gossip session down the pub with paladini, arguing over who to sack next.
QBP....a serious of lies including the false interview
jones...cctv lies, player lies...all round liar
MYU...no knowledge of QPR at all. Lied about working with QBP
Councillor Paul Fisher...libeled mark devlin in the greatest lie of all
funky...lied about slagging off fellow fans and muck spreading about families and children, another know nothing.
they are only with GP for the bit of kudos they think it brings them, once hes outed where will they run to next? i doubt any of them will be tolerated at loftus road.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jan 9, 2010 13:53:36 GMT
Of course I should have done the subject title differently....Because I'd assume/believe that to be true of all (but one) of the QPR sites: Not Clive Whittingham nor Battletank nor Drew Garro nor Ron Norris/Simon Skinner nor Paul Finney or Lonegunmen or Adam Boxer or anyone Some may also remember the big (madeup) hype to attract visitors/posters "Big Announcement" coming up.
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Jan 9, 2010 14:08:03 GMT
Mike - alot of the people you mentioned are decent people & people know what they put out is the truth.
pete whoever is one of these folk who most probably failed numerous times as a wannabe actor,in the past 2 years since the ''big announcement'' his opportunity has arouse to flourish among a young audience of QPR fans, i've seen some of it & it reminds me abit like one of those kid programmes where the big stupid adult does stupid things makes the kids laugh.
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on Jan 9, 2010 14:10:17 GMT
Could go on but I don't want to put the guys confidence down to much. Alot of kids out there would be heart broken if he stopped doing what he's doing.
|
|
|
Post by superckat on Jan 9, 2010 16:15:00 GMT
Yes, it was a publicity stunt regards the Flavio interview, because anyone starting a new web-site needs people talking about it, and thats what happened Oh thats OK then. As long as you have an excuse it's perfectly OK to lie to fellow QPR supporters for your own selfish wants (not needs). In other words if the number of hits goes down on that website then it is perfectly acceptable to lie to other fans as the number of people who visit the site is far more important than actually being honest with the fan base. If the tenet is we only lied a couple of times and therefore it's OK, then it's perfectly reasonable and I would say seemingly obvious to assume that lies are used all the time on that site to keep up the number of hits and simply excuse themselves with 'it's a rumours site'. Sorry QBP but as a fellow QPR supporter I, at the very least, expect you would have the respect not to lie to me and to see your admission that you did so in order to fulfill your selfish egotistical wants (again not needs) in running a QPR website then I have to ask: At what point does the importance of the amount of site visitors become more so than the truth? What are your real intentions behind the website, because if it was to supply the fanbase with an honest opinion from a website of integrity why would you lie to us from the beginning? If you had half the integrity you seem to imply in your rebuttal posts you would have issued a retraction and an apology instead of trying to mug us off (as a direct result of your lies). Those are questions for you to think about as I do not want to read anything you write again ever. Here's a truthful statement for you: You are a dishonest liar whose words can never be trusted, from your own admission. Mark, Absolutely brilliant and spot on.
|
|
|
Post by awrightmush on Jan 10, 2010 9:40:36 GMT
looking forward to seeing an interview with our ex sporting director...live from shepherds bush nick ;D
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Jan 10, 2010 9:51:19 GMT
And Flashback to How it was Done (Link to [Old] WATRB Site October 11, 2007 - Topic: Live Chat 4.15-4.45 Friday. Its flavio therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=rumours&action=display&thread=3761October 11, 2007 - Question You Would Like To Ask, Flavio?therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=799October 11, 2007 - Topic: Well done Pete..... therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=726October 12, 2007 - TODAY'S PROCEDURE FOR QUESTIONS therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=729October 12, 2007 - Flavio Interview therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=739October 12 - ALL A BIT OF FUN (therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=740October 13, WHO HERE THOUGHT FBtherangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=746One of my responses as nico, Funky, IsleworthFisher, etcNico: According to the last programme, you're still listed at the club's legal advisor. Assuming that's still the case, your statements I'd say, are inappropriate. You seem to repeatedly to onflated Gianni Paladini with Queens Park Rangers; and to make criticisms of Paladini or Pete or yourself as being anti-QPR - or troublemaking. As for my posts, and your comments: IF you actually read them, you'd see that I posted on various boards my view that while I condemned Pete's action, that enough was enough; that it wasn't the end or the world; and people should stop kicking someone when he was down. I also sent Pete a personal message expressing comparable views. therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=759The 'response'? Pete: "My First Banning"therangersboys.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=2&action=display&thread=768[OK enough of this. Great memories, but got to move on!
|
|
|
Post by eastpaddoknutta on Jan 11, 2010 13:35:25 GMT
i arranged an interview with GP only to find out he arranged for me to meet with the receptionist
who turned out to be more usefull
lol
|
|