|
Post by Macmoish on Apr 24, 2013 14:11:12 GMT
...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2013 15:26:44 GMT
The nasty scouse club director's, etc.........(As that's what I call Liverpool now) Already bitching about the length of the ban!!! Good to see they have learned from the Evra incident!!!..............Have really gone off them as there fans are quite repulsive really!!! Loads backing Suarez then & now!!!.............Even mocked Mansfield FC's home support in the FA cup match all the way through it, even though the were paying tribute to the Hillsborough 96 by leaving them empty!! & they got the hand ball goal from the vampire himself!!! Attachments:
|
|
bushranger
Dave Mangnall
"Billion pound team 1, funny little lad from Dorking via Plymouth Argyle 2" (LFW/CW)
Posts: 115
|
Post by bushranger on Apr 24, 2013 16:11:15 GMT
Not long enough! Should have been at least 12 (imho) same as Barton got.
|
|
obk
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,516
|
Post by obk on Apr 24, 2013 16:15:34 GMT
Looks like a good and well thought ruling to me.
|
|
|
Post by terryb on Apr 24, 2013 17:08:47 GMT
I was quite surprised at the length of his suspension, but suspect that Liverpool's failure to impose their own ban has led to the ten matches.
It will be interesting to see how they justify considerably more matches than they give for racial abuse.
|
|
peterg
Ian Holloway
Posts: 466
|
Post by peterg on Apr 24, 2013 17:16:00 GMT
"Not long enough! Should have been at least 12 (imho) same as Barton got."
Bartons was for 3 incidents though, athough this was a pretty awful thing for Saurez to do I struggle to see on what basis it qualifies for a ten match ban, when a rash 2 footed challenge has the potential for far more serious harm, what Aguero did stamping on a players thigh the other week was reckless but he gets of scot gree because "the referee saw part of the incident"
I dont mind i the fa give 3 match or 20 match bans as long as they are fair and consistent, sadly in my opinion they are not fair or consistent
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Apr 24, 2013 17:18:04 GMT
I thought it was very harsh...especially given other sentences - and especially given he didnt fight it a la John Terry. (I also though the Joey Barton penalty - much as I despise him - was excessively harsh --- Just as I found the QPR treatment him very problematic.
|
|
|
Post by kenthoop on Apr 24, 2013 18:11:43 GMT
Totally justified in my opinion ,although I agree with Peter g two incidents recently have not had any action taken is mcmanaman & aguerro which I find totally amazing no retrospective action was taken when to mind it deserved action we cannot have one law for one and another for others which seems to be the case ,anyway I reckon it should have been longer considering what joey got urrrrrrs
|
|
|
Post by grenqpr on Apr 24, 2013 18:19:42 GMT
Now if Suarez had bitten John Terry and Terry called him a name, they could have shook hands afterwards and even Sepp Blatter would have approved. It's all about who you bite!!. Some players can't even take a little bite these days. Back in the 70s Norman Hunter was always biting legs.
The FA must have taken his previous biting offence into consideration. Biting like headbutting will always be seen as deliberate and any punishment handed out is earned.
|
|
|
Post by gramps on Apr 24, 2013 18:25:16 GMT
Not a long enough ban in my opinion. Nothing can justify what he did. Anyway, he should worry; just means he now has a nice long holiday running into the close season. In my working days I would have lost my job immediately if I had physically assaulted a colleague or client.
|
|
manta
Gordon Jago
Posts: 945
|
Post by manta on Apr 24, 2013 19:38:40 GMT
Sorry if this has already been posted. It's an oldie.
|
|
|
Post by jjqpr on Apr 24, 2013 22:16:24 GMT
Sorry if this has already been posted. It's an oldie. Haha brilliant
|
|
|
Post by jjqpr on Apr 24, 2013 22:17:44 GMT
Oh my 2 cents...he should be banned from the premier league...he's already had enough warnings, bans and everyone knows hes a dirty, diving, cheating scumbag to top it all off...hardly a good advert for the league ....would also make it easier to watch MOTD next season know i dont have to see his face!
|
|
|
Post by sharky on Apr 25, 2013 7:43:05 GMT
If he wasn't such a good player he would have gone a long time ago. Will still be with Liverpool next year IMO. Without him, who will score their goals?
Also think 10 games is fair as this isn't his first biting offense.
|
|
|
Post by alfaranger on Apr 25, 2013 9:42:10 GMT
Odd one this.
I haven't bitten anyone since I bit my mum when I was about three and I got a whack. As far as I remember there may have been one child who bit at nursery school but he got a belt and stopped.
Since then I haven't witnessed it. I associate it with childishness (babyness really) like I do spitting. It's just not in my (our) culture, it is in some others though - like applauding a cheat.
I think 10 games is too much as an expression of disgust. He hasn't tried to break anyones leg or nutted anyone. I think Peterg has a point about fair and consistent. If this is worth 10 games then trying to potentially end someones career must be worth more and this should be stuck to.
|
|
|
Post by sharky on Apr 25, 2013 9:52:24 GMT
From the Barking and Dagenham Post
QPR bad boy plus ex-Spurs and Crystal Palace hitmen give verdict on Suarez ban
Joey Barton is held back by QPR coaches after being sent off against Manchester City on the final day of the 2011/12 season. Photo: Dave Thompson/PA
Thursday, April 25, 2013 8:32 AM QPR midfielder Joey Barton has labelled a 10-game ban for Luis Suarez as “fair” as the Liverpool striker’s bite on Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic’s arm has attracted differing reactions on Twitter.
The 10-game ban is not only harsher than the eight-match suspension handed to the Reds’ top goalscorer in December 2011 for racially abusing Manchester United’s Patrice Evra, but is significantly more than the four-game ban given to Blues club captain John Terry last year for racist abuse. The Football Association, though, is expected imminently to announce a new and more severe minimum ban for racism.
Barton was given a 12-game ban last season, for a red card and violent conduct towards three players on the final day of the campaign against Manchester City.
The midfielder has been on a season-long loan at Marseille but the ban meant he was unable to feature for the club in the French Ligue 1 until November 2012, though he was eligible for the Europa League.
In 2006, the FA banned Manchester City player Ben Thatcher for eight matches for an elbow incident that left Portsmouth’s Pedro Mendes unconscious.
The three-person regulatory commission included a former player and dealt with the case under the FA’s fast-track system.
It also appears that Suarez’s past has counted against him - the 26-year-old was banned for seven matches in Holland in 2010 when he sank his teeth into Otman Bakkal, and although that incident did not form any part of the FA’s case as it was in a different country, the commission had the discretion to take his personal disciplinary history into consideration.
The same approach was also taken in relation to deciding whether his eight-match racism ban should have any impact on the sanction for this case.
There is no standard minimum or maximum punishment for biting in football’s disciplinary code, unlike rugby union which has a 12-week recommended suspension for first offences up to a four-year ban for the most serious biting offences.
Barton last night tweeted from him @joey7barton account: ‘Think its a fair ban for Suarez. Mine was 2 longer and deservedly so in my eyes. Liverpool and the player, shouldn’t appeal. Its a fair ban!’
Former Tottenham striker and now Match of the Day presenter Gary Lineker, wrote: ‘10 game ban for Luis Suarez. Very strong punishment. Vital now that @fa are consistently strong on all issues eg racism, abusing refs etc. Also this ridiculous, if the ref saw it they can’t punish retrospectively nonsense, has to be addressed!’
Former Crystal Palace forward-turned TV pundit Mark Bright posted: ‘Repeat offense, no complaints with the 10 game ban for #Suarez he needs some help, he’ll now have plenty of time to get it. #lfc’
Suarez had apologised on Monday to Ivanovic, who suffered a bruised arm from the bite, and the Chelsea defender acknowledged the apology.
Liverpool moved quickly to deal with the latest crisis surrounding their star striker and imposed a club fine which is being donated to the Hillsborough families’ support group.
Suarez will remain eligible for the Professional Footballers’ Association Player of the Year award, for which he has been shortlisted, with the announcement on Sunday.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 25, 2013 15:13:56 GMT
I bet NASTY SCOUSE FC appeal.............Truly a club that has lost all sense of its purpose!!!!
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Apr 25, 2013 15:52:56 GMT
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Apr 25, 2013 22:29:57 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Lonegunmen on Apr 26, 2013 9:02:24 GMT
Suarez has been admitted to hospital. He's showing signs of an unknown disease. 2nd biting offence, 10 games is fair IMHO.
|
|
|
Post by gramps on Apr 26, 2013 11:33:52 GMT
Suarez has been admitted to hospital. He's showing signs of an unknown disease. 2nd biting offence, 10 games is fair IMHO. A mental hospital, I presume?
|
|
|
Post by saphilip on Apr 27, 2013 13:18:47 GMT
When I see what else is happening in football and the punishment dished out I would say Suarez's ban is excessive. Yes of course biting is bad & disgusting, etc - but is that more serious than somebody going in with studs showing with the full intent to cripple somebody or someboy putting his elbow in somebody's face? I don't think so.
All this highlights is that the total and utter lack of consistency of FA rulings and punishment and the sheer hypocricy that is English football. Suarez is many things, and a lot of it isn't pleasant, but the punishment he gets, not to the media attention, is totally out of proportion when you see a lot of the other incidents that get less than half the punishment & coverage.
Maybe 10 matches is a good enough punishment - but I would like to see others get the same treatment as well for what they do.
|
|
|
Post by Marc on Apr 27, 2013 18:29:59 GMT
Looks like Liverpool struggled without his goals today.
|
|
|
Post by canadaranger on Apr 27, 2013 20:22:32 GMT
On the basis of their 6-0 whomping of Newcastle today, Liverpool need Suarez as much as they need a dodgy pair of dentures... ;D
|
|