|
Post by kempton ranger on May 18, 2012 15:06:29 GMT
Maybe if we're appealing to the younger generation, we shouldn't keep the hoops period! Go for all Red - the colour of Manchester United. Or all Blue the colour of Chelsea... Run that one past KLR.
|
|
|
Post by sharky on May 18, 2012 15:06:43 GMT
I notice that the away red is the Air Asia red, not a Manure red or Arse red but Air Asia red. It will be quite different and unique in the Prem.
Agree too many hoops in the home kit, but hopefully that will be sorted out for 2012/13
|
|
|
Post by steveb66 on May 18, 2012 15:28:35 GMT
Thanks Zed hope it worked! Now thats 1970's! Attachments:
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on May 18, 2012 15:29:25 GMT
Thanks Zed hope it worked! Excellent!
|
|
|
Post by kempton ranger on May 18, 2012 15:33:48 GMT
Thanks Zed hope it worked! Now thats 1970's! He looks like Cheech out of Cheech and Chong.
|
|
|
Post by scarletpimple on May 18, 2012 15:44:54 GMT
Be glad when Loto is gone, not liked any of there shirts.
|
|
|
Post by Bushman on May 18, 2012 16:07:09 GMT
Good to see klr took the announcement of the new kit so well.
|
|
|
Post by sharky on May 18, 2012 16:21:53 GMT
My 15 year-old likes both kits. Maybe it is a generational thing.
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 18, 2012 16:22:40 GMT
The home kit is definitely an improvement but the away kit is a bit dodgy. Hope the 3rd kit is nice.
|
|
|
Post by Jon Doeman on May 18, 2012 17:02:56 GMT
Good to see klr took the announcement of the new kit so well. ;D
|
|
|
Post by Budgies Mullett on May 18, 2012 17:30:56 GMT
Totally hideous. Looks like something that Crockett and Tubbs would have rejected (look it up kids)
|
|
manta
Gordon Jago
Posts: 945
|
Post by manta on May 18, 2012 17:52:26 GMT
I like both shirts. My only quibble would be I wish they'd leave the sleeves white and possibly change us playing in black shorts instead of white. Can I say to those unhappy, regardless how many hoops are on the shirts, these are not stripes and there is nothing to say "this is how it should be". Here's the history of our shirt for a reminder: www.historicalkits.co.uk/Queens_Park_Rangers/Queens_Park_Rangers.htmWe had just as many hoops on our shirt in 1892!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2012 17:53:34 GMT
Its a cheap chavvy kit innit blud, give me me pink/ fluorescent lime green boots & qpr top innit blud, laughable. Embarrassing. At least you only have to look at it Poor Jamie Mackie has run his bo11ocks of for Rangers and they reward him by macking him stand there looking a cnut for everyone to laugh at What with Barton and a shirt with 36 hoops on it, how are we going to attract players
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 18, 2012 17:59:29 GMT
Its a cheap chavvy kit innit blud, give me me pink/ fluorescent lime green boots & qpr top innit blud, laughable. Embarrassing. At least you only have to look at it Poor Jamie Mackie has run his bo11ocks of for Rangers and they reward him by macking him stand there looking a cnut for everyone to laugh at What with Barton and a shirt with 36 hoops on it, how are we going to attract players If you think the kit will factor in whether or not a player will sign for us then I worry for you.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 18, 2012 18:17:23 GMT
I might of been exaggerating a tiny bit Rory
|
|
|
Post by Marc on May 18, 2012 18:17:27 GMT
I dont wear or buy replica kits, but I'm not having that. THAT IS F*CKING TERRIBLE! WHERE ARE THE HOOPS ? WHAT IS THAT NECK / COLLAR ALL ABOUT ? WHO ON EARTH DESIGNED THE AWAY KIT ?! I FAIL TO BELIEVE THAT THE PERSON THAT DESIGNED THAT IS A "PROFESSIONAL" NO, I'M DEFINATELY NOT HAVING THIS, HOW CAN THEY GET THINGS SO BADLY WRONG ? HOW HARD CAN IT BE ?! REALLY! Get off the fence! Do you like it or not?
|
|
Sabas
Dave Sexton
Posts: 2,349
|
Post by Sabas on May 18, 2012 18:18:25 GMT
Yet another QPR shirt that I won't be buying.
In the home kit, the blue V vest kind of thing is unnecessary. Why?
The away one is tok training-Sunday-leagur-like and is just cluttered with white lines and patches. Truly horrible.
Now it's clear to me... the resiatance to change the crest, the anthem thing, the dyslectic tweeting, and now the kits... Tony has no style. It's not the end of the world, but that's the way it is.
|
|
|
Post by Jon Doeman on May 18, 2012 18:20:33 GMT
Tony has no style. It's not the end of the world, but that's the way it is. Yeah bring back Flavio! ;D
|
|
Sabas
Dave Sexton
Posts: 2,349
|
Post by Sabas on May 18, 2012 18:21:13 GMT
Speaking about dyslexia :-) oops. Bloody ipod keyboard...
|
|
|
Post by fraserinbc on May 18, 2012 18:22:41 GMT
I like both shirts. My only quibble would be I wish they'd leave the sleeves white and possibly change us playing in black shorts instead of white. Can I say to those unhappy, regardless how many hoops are on the shirts, these are not stripes and there is nothing to say "this is how it should be". Here's the history of our shirt for a reminder: www.historicalkits.co.uk/Queens_Park_Rangers/Queens_Park_Rangers.htmWe had just as many hoops on our shirt in 1892! Unfortunately, a well-reasoned point that will be ignored by many. I quite like it, and as long as the horizontal line goes all of the way round then it is a hoop. Reading's kit generally has a white back, which is what makes it a stripe. I wonder how many people lost their sense of reasoning when we went with a light blue for the Brooks/Classic FM era?
|
|
|
Post by gthompson66 on May 18, 2012 18:39:11 GMT
Dont like thin stripes. We need thicker hoops.
Mind you I agree we can live with 'em, the club's getting it's act together with things like the training ground
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 18, 2012 18:49:15 GMT
Judging by some peoples reactions you would have thought we had ditched the hoops and changed the kit to pink or something.
|
|
manta
Gordon Jago
Posts: 945
|
Post by manta on May 18, 2012 19:02:29 GMT
Unfortunately, a well-reasoned point that will be ignored by many. I quite like it, and as long as the horizontal line goes all of the way round then it is a hoop. Reading's kit generally has a white back, which is what makes it a stripe. I wonder how many people lost their sense of reasoning when we went with a light blue for the Brooks/Classic FM era? Exactly, if the line goes horizontal fully around the shirt it's a hoop regardless how thin or fat it is and many there are. I usually think of stripes as vertical but at least ours doesn't stop half way.
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on May 18, 2012 19:50:19 GMT
I reckon the 3rd kit offered by Lotto was another mango monstrosity and the club knocked it back.
I wonder which Italian/Spanish club rehash we'll end up with.
|
|
|
Post by klr on May 18, 2012 20:16:55 GMT
Goodness gracious me, I've seen some sh!te in my time, but this takes the biscuit, its especially hard to take as QPR's kit over the years has been known as one of the most stylish in football amongst neutrals never mind QPR fans, WELL NOT ANY MORE!
I'm still waiting for someone to explain to me that Collar / Neck design, Strewth!
|
|
|
Post by klr on May 18, 2012 20:18:17 GMT
I've just worked it out, THE NECK LOOKS LIKE A TOILET SEAT! LOL
|
|
lofty
Dave Mangnall
Posts: 153
|
Post by lofty on May 18, 2012 20:33:25 GMT
Judging by some peoples reactions you would have thought we had ditched the hoops and changed the kit to pink or something. We're halfway there These are awful. A terrible crest, a kit that looks like a bad replica of Reading's... The most recognizable features of a football club, it's an embarrassment rather than a source of pride
|
|
lofty
Dave Mangnall
Posts: 153
|
Post by lofty on May 18, 2012 20:34:23 GMT
Can we break our contract with Lotto?
What happened to the days where fans could vote on the kit from a number of options on the official site?
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on May 18, 2012 20:42:12 GMT
Can't believe people are getting so wound up by the kits. It's still blue and white and still hooped, unlike Reading.
|
|
|
Post by gramps on May 18, 2012 21:23:19 GMT
Can't believe people are getting so wound up by the kits. It's still blue and white and still hooped, unlike Reading. I agree entirely Rory. What matters is what they do on the field, not what they are wearing - just as long as it isn't orange or whatever that is called.
|
|