bowles
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,939
|
Post by bowles on Apr 14, 2012 17:37:50 GMT
... WINNING LINE UP, DERRY WAS PISH POOR TODAY , BUZ SHOULD HAVE STARTED! THE THREAD I STARTED ON HERE ABOUT WHO SHOULD START THE WBA GAME DERRY OR BUZ, I SAID BUZ SHOULD START BECAUSE HE SCORES GOALS BUT TO A MAN YOU ALL SAID DERRY SHOULD START!
|
|
|
Post by RoryTheRanger on Apr 14, 2012 17:57:25 GMT
I said Buzz I think, can't remember.
I think that's the worst I've ever seen Derry play in a QPR shirt.
Zamora was poor as well, he cod have had 4 goals that game but missed all his chances.
|
|
bowles
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,939
|
Post by bowles on Apr 14, 2012 18:20:05 GMT
Well rory you were one of the few! as isaid buz can always pull a goal outta the bag where as derry even though i like him scores every ten years!
|
|
|
Post by Macmoish on Apr 14, 2012 19:46:47 GMT
I wanted Derry...But I wanted a good Derry...and then Bring on Buzsaky if needed him
Zamora the goal machine
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 14, 2012 20:15:58 GMT
I never agree with changing a winning side unless it's forced upon you.
Zamora was too isolated with that formation. Taarabt wasn't at his best, Diakite gave the ball away too often but we should still have taken a draw ate least. Thought Kenny should have done better with the goal as well but there you go.
|
|
bowles
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,939
|
Post by bowles on Apr 14, 2012 20:20:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 14, 2012 20:22:58 GMT
Good, hope you're feeling better now, nice one.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2012 0:03:37 GMT
Warnock would not of changed a team that had won 3-0 Warnock never believed in changing a winning team
|
|
|
Post by alqpr81 on Apr 15, 2012 1:24:23 GMT
Warnock hardly ever had to worry about changing a winning team did he?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 15, 2012 1:29:16 GMT
Warnock hardly ever had to worry about changing a winning team did he? Not in the premiership I suppose
|
|
|
Post by jayrigg on Apr 15, 2012 6:31:14 GMT
After all is said and done hindsight is a wonderful thing. However i really thought MH should have gone for broke up there. 1 pointers are no good at this stage of the season, we have already lost enough and drawn enough of these games to realise that. To stick BZ up by himself again against initially a very well organised defence didn't do it for me. It seems that when we start these away days, for the first 30 minutes the players don't quite know which way they have to play, then they go a goal down, and start to play. The good news is our goal difference is superior to the teams around us and i reckon it could go to the wire this year and goal difference might just matter. Cheers, Jay
|
|
|
Post by alqpr81 on Apr 15, 2012 13:05:11 GMT
i don't really see how you can say we played defensively for a point when Zamora really should have got a hattrick the amount of clear chances he had, combined with close efforts from Mackie and Diakite, how we came away from that game with nothing is just beyond me. It also makes it even more frustrating...the 2nd half was all Rangers!
The only thing I would say is Hughes made a gamble to go 4-4-2 with wingers and our two target men up front, and on this occasion it didn't work. But if it did, we'd all be singing his praises. At least he tried to do something!
But we still should have been out of sight before it got to that stage in the first place - you can't blame the manager for Bobby missing everything.
|
|
|
Post by mikehunt on Apr 15, 2012 15:05:25 GMT
we havent won away for 5 months, and it will be six by the end of the season. that was just too easy for west brom, like so many other games this season prior to the livepool and arsenal games. if a team needs to score , they do, then thats enough and they just have a strol about till the ref blows up.
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on Apr 15, 2012 16:53:07 GMT
Warnock hardly ever had to worry about changing a winning team did he? Hehe.
|
|
|
Post by jayrigg on Apr 15, 2012 18:38:12 GMT
i don't really see how you can say we played defensively for a point when Zamora really should have got a hattrick the amount of clear chances he had, combined with close efforts from Mackie and Diakite, how we came away from that game with nothing is just beyond me. It also makes it even more frustrating...the 2nd half was all Rangers! The only thing I would say is Hughes made a gamble to go 4-4-2 with wingers and our two target men up front, and on this occasion it didn't work. But if it did, we'd all be singing his praises. At least he tried to do something! But we still should have been out of sight before it got to that stage in the first place - you can't blame the manager for Bobby missing everything. Defensively no, but 4-4-2 with Zamora and someone else from the start yes. Cheers, Jay
|
|
|
Post by harlowranger on Apr 15, 2012 19:12:12 GMT
Lets move on to the next game , Spurs are going to be hurting today , rather they had won 1-0 if honest now they will come at us guns blazing . Arsenal need to stuff Wigan first.
|
|
|
Post by Lonegunmen on Apr 16, 2012 0:01:36 GMT
Bolton need to lose their two games in hand too.
|
|