|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 11, 2009 19:57:49 GMT
No. No. and No again.
At least Waddock had years of coaching experience.
Should he be appointed, it would signal one very clear thing
(But obviously if you want him, feel free to put the case for; or at least to show he wouldnt be that bad)
|
|
dreamr
Gerry Francis
Posts: 88
|
Post by dreamr on Apr 11, 2009 21:41:50 GMT
Wow, that was a short honeymoon period.
I do agree with your philosophy Mike, but I think that strong willed/minded 'first team coaches' are lost on QPR. The problem isn't Ainsworth. It's Painadini and Flabby. For what it's worth, I like Ainsworth. I know he hasn't anything special to impart to the team, but we played ok under him/the hierarchy the last time.
Wonder how the Mittals feel about the current situation? That's another thread?
|
|
dreamr
Gerry Francis
Posts: 88
|
Post by dreamr on Apr 11, 2009 21:43:55 GMT
By the way, Flabs isn't going to change. Not at this stage. Paladini is totally in there too. Like a veruca.
|
|
|
Post by scarletpimple on Apr 11, 2009 21:48:09 GMT
Please no.
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 11, 2009 23:33:47 GMT
THIS IS A VERY DIFFICULT ONE TO CALL WE ALL KNOW HUNDREDS OF FOOTBALLERS FAIL IN MANAGEMENT I JUST DONT KNOW WHAT TO MAKE OF AINSWORTH THE MANAGER
its difficult i had no trouble in saying that i thought sousa was no good but ainsworth is differant i just dont know
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 11, 2009 23:40:38 GMT
You can say sousa was no good but you don't know about ainsworth.
To your left, the men approaching in white coats and a needle are here to take you away ...
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 11, 2009 23:50:26 GMT
baz i just like everyone else i am trying to use my own sense of perception when ray wilkins was made manager i was so happy he just looked one hundred per cent manager how could he have done so terrible it just dosnt make sense
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 11, 2009 23:55:47 GMT
It was Wilkins inheritance, the rot had already set in.
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 12, 2009 0:01:07 GMT
dont know about that wilkins first managerial mistake was to tell wilson he was too old the btreaking up of one of the best defences in the prem waas the bigging of the rot i sussed out sousa when he dropped blackstock after scoring five goals in his first eight games what sousa didnt take into account was that dexter had sufferd with his confidence the previous year and to only give dexter six starts in his 24 GAMES WAS CRAZY
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 12, 2009 2:34:34 GMT
He was under orders.
di carmine had to play.
wilson didn't go coz he was too old.
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Apr 12, 2009 2:45:46 GMT
Ainsworth has no managerial experience. Hes kept around just for these situations. You know the acting manager in house who knows his place and wipes the bosses vomit up. Nice guy wonderful hustling 120% ter but not a manager. Even the opuppet mangers talk up at their own risk. But as I said in anoither post, no manager will move the team unless he is well vetted and Flav gives up a lot of control and Paladin is moved out of Sporting director.
|
|