|
|
Post by QPR Report on Nov 10, 2008 12:51:48 GMT
Lee Cook says yes. QPR Report says no  And other views? |
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on Nov 10, 2008 13:09:17 GMT
No but I'm happy if it takes a while as long as we get the right man in the end.
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 10, 2008 13:20:16 GMT
no.
|
|
dax
Gerry Francis
Posts: 11
|
Post by dax on Nov 10, 2008 13:46:42 GMT
No. he was on the Anal Brazil breakkie show this AM. Nice lad, has a job as no.2 learning from Mancini for me.
|
|
obk
Dave Sexton
Posts: 1,516
|
Post by obk on Nov 10, 2008 13:59:36 GMT
No
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Nov 10, 2008 15:17:53 GMT
But you have to like him:  "I'm enjoying it a lot and at the moment I am taking it day by day. Flavio Briatore and the fans have given me their backing so far. As long as that is going on I am a happy man - I'm proud to be at the helm of QPR. I've been here a long time and I just want the club to do well. If Flavio does decide to put me in charge then fantastic. If he doesn't then I will stay in some capacity. I'm really enjoying pitting my wits against managers..." |
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 10, 2008 18:26:37 GMT
Since i dont think he is going anywhere he is learning by doing. He already set the back table the fullbacks are better defensiveley, But dont like to cross accurately. so he has skills to teach and encourage. Buszaky as an attacking midfielder is great. keep two strikers upfront who can play together. He is getting there. I dont like the changing home and away lineups. He does so must be a reason but i see it as confusion. must use the same midfielders but talk to Flav about what he wants also. Keep the fullbacks constant. Dont adjust to other teams let them adjust to us. Read the top books on managing and give Flav one to read also
|
|
|
|
Post by mkranger on Nov 10, 2008 18:35:22 GMT
I think 451 away and 442 home is a sound tactic. Getting a team used to other formations can only improve the team. For example against Man ure a 451 counter tactic will benefit us. Trouble starts though if you dont play the players in there posistion ala Dowie.
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 10, 2008 19:05:24 GMT
why is one striker away better than two?. Not that i dont necessarily disagree but we have not scored away from home in 5 games. for mk or anyone
|
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Nov 10, 2008 19:10:06 GMT
I personally believe that you play a formation and stick with it. Personnel can be brought in and out in appropriate positions but th formation remains the same. Players can cope with that but cannot cope with changing styles of play IMO.
Don't confuse the poor blighters, you can the same thing at all levels of football. Play to your strengths and stick with them.
|
|
|
|
Post by mkranger on Nov 10, 2008 20:39:40 GMT
We started with 451 at the beggining of the season because of lack of options upfront. Dicarmine, Pat and Dex arent bad strikers but they are not enough. Our goal tally this season reflects that. We miss Vine badly so 451 makes sense at the moment. But classic 442 is for me the only way to play. But without more options uofront a dual system is a benefit for us short term.
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 10, 2008 20:40:49 GMT
As my dad says "You said it son "
|
|
|
|
Post by mkranger on Nov 10, 2008 20:42:35 GMT
As for Gazza getting the job please dont take it Gaz, stay in a coaching role!
|
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on Nov 10, 2008 21:25:17 GMT
I personally believe that you play a formation and stick with it. Personnel can be brought in and out in appropriate positions but th formation remains the same. Players can cope with that but cannot cope with changing styles of play IMO. Don't confuse the poor blighters, you can the same thing at all levels of football. Play to your strengths and stick with them. I agree with all of that. |
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 10, 2008 21:31:59 GMT
Ditto sometimes the confusion can be cut with a knife remember one back that stopped running thought someone else was covering. But no whingeing from me.
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 11, 2008 10:26:21 GMT
A qpr manager named ainse
Ran the team without any pains
when they started to lose
Ainse took to the booze
Then the owners were racking their brains
|
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Nov 11, 2008 11:53:15 GMT
Are you weavie in disguise..... Are you weavie...... In disguise... Are you weavie... Are you weavie.....  Actually, too good for weavie!   ;D |
|
|
|
Post by floridaranger on Nov 11, 2008 13:49:35 GMT
Lee Cook says yes. QPR Report says no And other views? GP - Waddock scenario unfolding again. I hope he does well *with very little experience. |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Nov 11, 2008 14:02:54 GMT
Hey he's already got pat all the trite cliches almost every British manager seems to employ. (That's one reason De Canio had to go: Those cliches just don't translate). And he CARES. And he talks about "passion." What more could you need?
If Ainsworth truly is a "one for the future" coach, then a Venables type appointment looks better. He's there for a year or two; learning from the master, before taking over. Of course Venables said no way would he accept a Briatore type involvement .
If Ainsworth IS appointed manager (as seems likely), and it doesn't work out; then it will become difficult for him to revert back to coach.
|
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Nov 11, 2008 14:37:41 GMT
it works well for them. About the money. I think theyre playing games.they have no idea what they want. flav says the premiersihp or bust. another says get to playoffs. Beat Man u and you have job. Its all pr and he loves the limelight. If he doesnt start making money he will find ways to do so which may be selling, still were in 7th place in a sort of crazy gang and perhaps that is the answer to promotion. aka Wimbledon. What do you think Report. I disagree that ainsworth will be appointed manager and they arent going to beat Man u. Its all work in progress. Follow the money firsly though. Its not going into the teams wages but Scotts series yesterday tells you they have some bigger fish on the fry
|
|
;D