|
Post by superckat on May 3, 2009 1:18:59 GMT
bp. I really don't know why you're even entertaining him. Go to bed.
|
|
|
Post by bp on May 3, 2009 1:19:39 GMT
I can't believe you haven't told Scott to eat sh*t i cant believe that no one who has read the trial notes has commented on how bp let the, get away with it. Bill says in his earlier post about the dudes but in court said things like it would be impossible for Gianni to have broke free from the blokes due to the size of them. in context, in court, saying GP was telling porkies. Anyway, like I said Karma and all that. As BP himself said, something happened untoward, lets hope a civil case is taken. Albeit, i genuinely feel sorry for devlin an bp being dragged to court non stop absolutely. if the 4 guys that where barring me from getting into our offices had got hold of Gi there is no way in the world he could have got away from THEM. you are so right to quote me. what is your point? I have no worries about karma and the nice thing is all my mates say if there is anything like Karma they all want to come back as my dog. x
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 1:19:42 GMT
But why try and get him the sack. What did he do that was worth you trying to stop him earning a living? sorry, you're mistakenhe's the one that tried to get me the sack. phoned diageo asking why a member of their staff used messageboards during work hours. Did the same to many people as well. He's lucky no one has done the same to him (probably why he's stopped posting)
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on May 3, 2009 1:21:38 GMT
Scott did threaten someone on LFW saying he'd stop them getting a job and then he took the p1ss out of another members disabled son.
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 1:23:31 GMT
i cant believe that no one who has read the trial notes has commented on how bp let the, get away with it. Bill says in his earlier post about the dudes but in court said things like it would be impossible for Gianni to have broke free from the blokes due to the size of them. in context, in court, saying GP was telling porkies. Anyway, like I said Karma and all that. As BP himself said, something happened untoward, lets hope a civil case is taken. Albeit, i genuinely feel sorry for devlin an bp being dragged to court non stop absolutely. if the 4 guys that where barring me from getting into our offices had got hold of Gi there is no way in the world he could have got away from THEM. you are so right to quote me. what is your point? I have no worries about karma and the nice thing is all my mates say if there is anything like Karma they all want to come back as my dog. x So you are saying that gianni was lieing? cheers for clearing that up. Oh and ignore everything bart says in your local. He owes me more than one favour.
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 1:25:18 GMT
Scott did threaten someone on LFW saying he'd stop them getting a job and then he took the p1ss out of another members disabled son. all BS and in context lets keep the conversation to convicted and non convicted criminals, this is a highly serious situation which bill is kindly clarifying
|
|
|
Post by bp on May 3, 2009 1:26:48 GMT
bp. I really don't know why you're even entertaining him. Go to bed. You're right. What's worse is I have let a chilled glass of pop get warm while tapping away. Even worse, what the fcek are you doing up this late. Hope all is well sweetheart x
|
|
|
Post by bp on May 3, 2009 1:34:14 GMT
So you are saying that gianni was lieing? cheers for clearing that up. Oh and ignore everything bart says in your local. He owes me more than one favour. I have no idea what Gi said, I was not in the court when he gave his evidence. But I would not dispute what he said for a second outside what he told me. Where are you going here Schit? Bart??? Who the **** is Bart??? Try drinking orange juice rather than red bull.
|
|
|
Post by superckat on May 3, 2009 1:40:59 GMT
bp. I really don't know why you're even entertaining him. Go to bed. You're right. What's worse is I have let a chilled glass of pop get warm while tapping away. Even worse, what the fcek are you doing up this late.Hope all is well sweetheart x I find it's the best time to search for porn.. lol. That is a joke btw. I'm a bit of a late owl
|
|
|
Post by superckat on May 3, 2009 1:45:16 GMT
So Scott you threatened to stop someone getting a job and took the piss out of someone's disabled son. You have some serious issues... I can see now why you're so interested in Karma. You must be sh.itting yourself.
|
|
|
Post by Lonegunmen on May 3, 2009 7:28:03 GMT
Bloody hell, what a read, having now covered all three pages. Scott, way out of line trying to retry a trial that has been completed. If you have issues on whether or not Bill has comitted perjury or done something illegal, might I suggest you follow it up through legal methods and lay a complaint instead of dishing it up on a MB??
Bill has shown a remarkable tolerance and asnwered your questions, so why are you chasing him?
Bill, being a devient, yes i am interested in your sexual activities - just kidding ya. Trying to lighten this up a bit.
After my initial post to this message thread, I am quite surprised at the direction it has taken. I am disappointed it has turned so pear shaped. As I said, take it to court if there are some issues, not on this MB or any other MB.
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on May 3, 2009 8:14:42 GMT
I find it's the best time to search for porn.. lol. That is a joke btw. I'm a bit of a late owl Gotta disagree with you there superckat. I find the best time is between 7-8am. Well, it get's me up in the morning!
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on May 3, 2009 8:24:57 GMT
As I noted on another thread, Scott is no longer a moderator.
At least as of now, this thread remains open and remains up. and there is no ban on Scott.
Sometimes threads disintegrate and many people are to blame. But on this thread, I would say that with one single, solitary exception, everyone on this thread has kept well within bounds. And BP has gone far, far beyond what probably most of us would have tolerated and shown true grace.
|
|
|
Post by Markqpr on May 3, 2009 8:33:37 GMT
Think we can move on now!
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on May 3, 2009 11:00:38 GMT
Yeh let's move on....
|
|
bigade
Gerry Francis
Posts: 93
|
Post by bigade on May 3, 2009 11:12:11 GMT
point 1. was this really worth digging up again ? point 2 have you ever heard of the saying discretion is the better part of valour? point 3 hanging out your dirty washing in public is neither required or desired by most.
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on May 3, 2009 11:31:35 GMT
point 1. was this really worth digging up again ? I don't think it was, unless Scott wants to take an independent action with tort ! Was this for the purpose of discovery ! Were the questions in line with the standards of duty of care, laws of admissions ? Were the questions a request for admissions in an ongoing case ! What next a subpoena ? for deposition ? Duty of care harm must be a "reasonably foreseeable" result of the defendant's conduct a relationship of "proximity" between the defendant and the claimant it must be "fair, just and reasonable" to impose liability.
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on May 3, 2009 11:45:11 GMT
Bill you are quite within your rights to seek injunctive relief from a cyberstalker ! obviously not me
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on May 3, 2009 11:49:12 GMT
point 1. was this really worth digging up again ? I don't think it was, unless Scott wants to take an independent action with tort ! Was this for the purpose of discovery ! Were the questions in line with the standards of duty of care, laws of admissions ? Were the questions a request for admissions in an ongoing case ! What next a subpoena ? for deposition ? Duty of care harm must be a "reasonably foreseeable" result of the defendant's conduct a relationship of "proximity" between the defendant and the claimant it must be "fair, just and reasonable" to impose liability. Perhaps Scott could clearly lay out (without passion) what he believes to be the case to answer here. Is it that the courts were lied to? or that the CPS failed to do their job properly? or what? If you do do that here or elsewhere Scott try to be specific as to what leads you to believe this? If your argument has merit I will support your right to make it.
|
|
|
Post by FloridaR on May 3, 2009 12:05:21 GMT
I believe his argument is invalid.
Claimant/Defendant/Witness/s knew of each other on a social, daily weekly, yearly basis in life, all had contact. what Scott is insinuating is that were '' colluding '' .
What he needs is hard concrete facts in the form of physical evidence any underlying agreements, moneys, electronic comminique etc..
Scott
you put up so how about it..... lets see it !!!!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 20:18:42 GMT
Great read this.
Best thread outside the old QPR photos one.
|
|
|
Post by cpr on May 3, 2009 20:23:48 GMT
Laugh a minute you are.
|
|
|
Post by superckat on May 3, 2009 20:37:33 GMT
Great read this. Best thread outside the old QPR photos one. Strange you should think that considering you have lost a lot of credibility and respect from everyone who has read this thread. Really nothing to be proud of.
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 20:40:13 GMT
Come on, where else would you get the ex chairman of our club having a barny with a fan? Makes for fantastic reading and would have driven loads to this site. Social media engagement , its what i do.
|
|
|
Post by cpr on May 3, 2009 20:42:33 GMT
"Fan"?
Abuse of the term.
Might as well change your logon to millwall.
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 20:51:26 GMT
I dont think moderators are supposed to abuse people Barry.
Please watch your postings ;D
|
|
|
Post by cpr on May 3, 2009 21:01:41 GMT
I used the word abuse I did not abuse. Laugh a minute you are.
|
|
finney
Dave Mangnall
Posts: 175
|
Post by finney on May 3, 2009 22:47:56 GMT
Scott, You are so out of order it is untrue may i tell you that to say that the plane crash was karma is a step too far and you said the same about Mark Devlin. Who the feck made you god to judge anyone on this earth. A ten year old lad was in that crash wise up.
I also recall a postings on the old LSA board when you said you knew the person in charge of the case you are now talking about and how they said GP had made it all up.You seem to have forgotten that post? You seem to think of yourself as the new internet cyber hero for GP now Nico has gone. But you are fact becoming nothing more than a smear-merchant high on something and low on facts.
I will leave you with this.
Most of the Bullies and Populars have two companians flanking them. When greeting them look at their posse and say: "Tweedledum, Tweedledumber" then turn to the leader and say: "Ah, you must be Tweedledee!"
|
|
|
Post by Lonegunmen on May 3, 2009 23:01:29 GMT
Good to see you on here Paul, thanks for clarifying that.
|
|
|
Post by scottjones on May 3, 2009 23:10:41 GMT
Scott, You are so out of order it is untrue may i tell you that to say that the plane crash was karma is a step too far and you said the same about Mark Devlin. Who the feck made you god to judge anyone on this earth. A ten year old lad was in that crash wise up. I also recall a postings on the old LSA board when you said you knew the person in charge of the case you are now talking about and how they said GP had made it all up.You seem to have forgotten that post? You seem to think of yourself as the new internet cyber hero for GP now Nico has gone. But you are fact becoming nothing more than a smear-merchant high on something and low on facts. I will leave you with this. Most of the Bullies and Populars have two companians flanking them. When greeting them look at their posse and say: "Tweedledum, Tweedledumber" then turn to the leader and say: "Ah, you must be Tweedledee!" Welcome to the board Paul. Glad you're here. Knew this would coax you over ;D Marketing, gotta love it.
|
|