Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report Claim

[eastpaddoknutta]

Apr 21, 2011 13:42:11 GMT Jon Doeman said:

I agree with the Nutta,
take the high ground, ignore it and keep threads like this of the board.
Be for the best IMO

imo theres much better things to talk about

and another thing it cant look like great reading for somone who isnt and doesnt know nothing about the threads more than likely resulting in them not wanting to get involved or feeling like they cant as the bigest thread and all ways will be the differences between report and watrb

[Macmoish]

I'm fully aware people of that. Which is why time after time, we've tried to ignore these various efforts emanating from that source and his friends. Many of them you don't even know about.

But when falsehoods are uttered - not opinion, but falsehoods - every now and then, a response is warranted: If only it entails drawing attention to what's being said.

And as I said Nutta: Go onto WATRB and "speak truth to power" there, by posting the same sentiments and admonitions to Pete.

[Bushman]

This is a terrible waste of energy. I know things have been said in the past as well as the present and I am sure will be said in the future, but what is being said is a nonsense and it turns into silly playground tit for tat antics.
We on this board are far better than that and should not take the bait.

[Macmoish]

Apr 21, 2011 14:27:48 GMT Bushman said:

This is a terrible waste of energy. ....We on this board are far better than that and should not take the bait.

You're so right, Bushman...But, to go back to another quote from the Good Book! "The Spirit is Willing, but the Flesh is weak"

[eastpaddoknutta]

Apr 21, 2011 14:24:36 GMT Macmoish said:

I'm fully aware people of that. Which is why time after time, we've tried to ignore these various efforts emanating from that source and his friends. Many of them you don't even know about.

But when falsehoods are uttered - not opinion, but falsehoods - every now and then, a response is warranted: If only it entails drawing attention to what's being said.

And as I said Nutta: Go onto WATRB and "speak truth to power" there, by posting the same sentiments and admonitions to Pete.

i would do it face to face if it was spoken about but i never get the indication that thats what pete wants to do as i said theres prob better things to speak about mike

its still comes down to the same thing everytime and being honest report and watrb have one difference on "ONE" topic and everyting that goes around it?

if i go there and same the same thing every poster would say "well why dont you go and ask mike at reports site?"

back to the circle affect of he said, they said she said

why dont "REPORT" and "WATRB" just agree for every ones sake new and old to discuss it between your selfves if it has to be debated or become worthy of debating

leave your personal differances aside and both parties stop being so defensive to it all

this one time both take to the higher ground and leave it at that

[Macmoish]

Nutta

Thanks.

I'll say it one last time (or maybe not last time!)

Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site.

Pete then on WATRB elaborated and made several points about this site.

Now you and other can certainly make a good case that I and others should ignore those comments.

But it's not valid to make it a "Plague on both your houses."

[Markqpr]

Apr 21, 2011 13:37:57 GMT eastpaddoknutta said:

its massively disscussed and "debated"

I've always thought you were a mass debater.

[eastpaddoknutta]

Apr 21, 2011 14:48:39 GMT Macmoish said:

Nutta

Thanks.

I'll say it one last time (or maybe not last time!)

Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site.

Pete then on WATRB elaborated and made several points about this site.

Now you and other can certainly make a good case that I and others should ignore those comments.

But it's not valid to make it a "Plague on both your houses."

Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site

which didnt realy needed to be responded to

Pete then on WATRB elaborated and made several points about this site.

which was because there was something on here, a reaction for hi to do so

Now you and other can certainly make a good case that I and others should ignore those comments.

now my case and all ways have been, if pete is a vile human being and has an agenda against this site, and pete thinks that Reports users antaganise him wind him up etc

and mike your self and report are not and dont go about the siutation like that

why is there a 5 page thread about it? why is report seeking answers

you have tried time and time again and frankly i think its not worth it i dont want any one to debate this and it will be the last time that i say anything about because now it seems like i care or im bothered

i just dont think its worth it

from an outsiders point of view it dosent matter what report or watrb prove by you tube vids funny pictures radio shows media cuttings or meetings with gianni or players of the club

it looks childish from both parties, visualy.

i hope i dont offend no one id rather have this lot wiped of the message board all together

im looking forward to cardiff so much and im disapointed that the points deduction is the highlight at present on this and on any other site which is y i talk on 1882 coz i like babes booze and having a laugh when i come online not same old same old

onwards and upwords

U R'SSSSSSSSSSS

[eastpaddoknutta]

Apr 21, 2011 15:24:07 GMT Markqpr said:

Apr 21, 2011 13:37:57 GMT eastpaddoknutta said:

its massively disscussed and "debated"

I've always thought you were a mass debater.

No im just mass lol

[cpr]

"Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site"

"which didnt realy needed to be responded to"

Nutta!

Why didn't it need to be responded to? Because it's OK for Pete to make a scattergun assault on numerous posters on this board without any recourse? Totally wrong, his comments wereo out of order as Isleworth has already attested to!

Go on his site and tell him there was no need to use someone else's radio show to have a pop and then we would not be discussing this.

By the way, it's gone on this long because you've prolonged it yourself.



As an aside, qblockpete is not banned from this site, never has been. AND THAT'S A FACT.

I suppose we could post a list of banned posters and they will not be a surprise to anyone!

[Macmoish]

I'm going to lock this thread now. Just as Pete has locked the thread on WATRB.

I am not going to say "Time to Move On' or "This is my last word on the subject." And I have no doubt about the merits. Or a repeated pattern that we have seen and experienced.

But I am cognizant of the fact that most people on this board are not interested in board wars. You post or read this site for a reason. And this site is growing so well for a reason. And that reason is certainly not because you want to engage in an intra-board dispute. Certainly not with this particular person.

So I'll just conclude this thread with Pete's "concluding" post on this subject on WATRB.

And to all of you I can only say: Onward and Upward


"Going to close the thread, as really don't want this tit for tat. Anything I say gets copied and pasted. I see my boy (hardly he is 28, but you know what I mean) as posted, I've told him to keep off.

They are a happy band of brothers, should be kept that way. QPR report has been a master over the years of declaring his undying love for the club, he sees himself as kind of figurehead, when in fact he is a supporter like me or you. I don't care if his last game was in 1969, but don't go arround trying to be above everyone else in terms of supporting the club.

I'd expect an influx of posters from that site on here after the FA hearing, so I'd rather wait in anticipation for that."