|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 0:01:32 GMT
From QPBLOCK PETE on WATRBThe Official WATRB's Name of Sauces "... Okay, we have one or two that are a little envious of this site. I always believe if you are talked about that means everyone knows about you. We are normally first with any news." In future, whether its about new players, new away kit, club news or you heard a rumour please state our sauces. Some will want to use the information we give first to fans, on another web-site. In future these are the names to be used, if we give information to our fans that we feel they need to know or be first to know. Some others may want to damage this site, as its so popular. Please use these names if you hear anything that our fans would like to know first. At the end of the day we are ALL QPR." Link to WATRB www.wearetherangersboys.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7369
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 12, 2009 0:07:44 GMT
I think he's finally lost it.....its having no PS to slaughter
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 12, 2009 0:27:06 GMT
CANT BELIEVE WHEN YOU DID THAT POLL ON HIS MESSAGE BOARD EIGHT WEEKS AGO YOU FINISHED FIRST I CAME SECOND NOW WE ARE PROMOTING AN OTHER MESSAGE BOARD WOULDNT IT BE CRAZY IF WE TURNED THIS MESSAGE BOARD INTO THE BEST QPR SITE OF ALL
that must be our target to beat all the other message boards
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 0:39:58 GMT
I think of this site as being more of a boutique site for the QPR elite: The ones who appreciate the history and true uniqueness of Queen's Park Rangers Football Club
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 12, 2009 0:43:34 GMT
WELL YOUVE ALWAYS GIVEN ME RESPECT SO WHO KNOWS WHERE THIS LITTLE SITE WILL END UP
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 0:47:36 GMT
However big or small this site gets Whatever it's ultimate fate. It will do so with an adherence to honesty, integrity, humility and treating fellow posters with respect. And with no Faustian deal made in the process.
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 12, 2009 1:01:46 GMT
Don't encourage him ffs!
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 1:30:11 GMT
A cynic would say permission's been granted to appear independent - with some "bold" statements re needing to spend on strikers and no more International loans. Still waiting for an apology from Pete or an apology or some acknowledgment of the ban and recission - and the very generous apoplogy from the WATRB moderators. But from Pete: Nothing - Neither publicly on the WATRB forum (or this forum). Not even a private message - and he knows how to pm me cos he's done it before. Maybe I'll need to fly over and appear outside Loftus Road with a Sandwich board and the placard "Pete/Schmete: Apologise" on one side. (And on the other: Pete/Schmete: Purveyor of Confidential Club Information"
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 12, 2009 7:21:51 GMT
mike vmy grandfather was brougt up by a jewish family so maybe ive got a little jewish thing about me thats why i always attacked racist and anti sematics maybe thats the reason why mike has always accepted me my honesty has got me banned from three sites so thats a testament that i do just say what ever my feelings are so i do bring conjecture and controversy but i do have a big heart and im passionate about qpr my dad took me there as a four year old fifty years ago so its been bred into me
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 7:26:15 GMT
OK: I appreciate that: And now back to Pete and WATRB
- Very interesting given all his past comments (and words do have meaning). If you set out one set of beliefs and repeat them and repeat them and repeat them, it becomes extremely jarring when post totally different. Makes one wonder
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 8:15:51 GMT
It's also almost total bullshit "... We are normally first with any news"
Except for the occasional snippet of actual NEWS, and leaked confidential information gotten from the club (which I personally wouldn't have touched) I'd match QPR Report "reporting" (yes copy/pasting, Pete anyday of the week.
That's why hours and even days later, you get Pete announcing things, or "reporting" a press item, already posted on QPR Report - and of course other messageboards.
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 12, 2009 8:24:30 GMT
but to really market this site mike you have to come across as all loving and totally un biased anything you say to the detrement of pete will be cut and pasted and you will be portrayed as a nasty person we must market this site as the love site because when this site becomes really big you must expect a lot of trolls to be placed on this site and they will do to you what the dot org trolls are currently dping to petes new site so when trouble comes we have to turn the other cheek and just be full of love love BEATS everything
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 8:30:37 GMT
To paraphrase "Love/Schmove!" This site is Independent This site (and poster) will stand by its past posts. And one is accountable for one's past statements This site permits all points of view to be expressed - without abuse and denigration of the poster. If "The Trolls" come (and some have already been), then this site will convert into a "By Invitation Only" Site. But if you mean supporters/defenders of Paladini: Well if they're serious QPR fans, and genuinely believe in Paladini or Briatore, their views are welcome. As long as everything is kept civil. "Turning the Other Cheek"? I think that's New Testament. Old Testament is "An Eye for An Eye. A tooth for a Tooth" Alternatively we can go to the Book of Revelations and the "Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse" - Replacing the Gang of Three?
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 12, 2009 8:44:24 GMT
because you have showed great love in allowing me to use your site even though you know ive been kicked off all the other sites for being too agressive i will tell you mike that its petes image that sold the watrbS SITE its doing bundles because pete comes over as a really nice bloke who loves rangers so to trully get this site kicking our agenda should be to be nice to any one who comes onto this site and to promote QPR AND TO MAKE OUR NUMBER ONE TOPIC qpr for the prem im 54 years of age my father died at 56 i want to die with qpr being in the prem i must take with me that final memorie my dad died january 1982 if only he could have lived just a few months more he could have seen qpr in a fa cup final
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 8:50:59 GMT
....its petes image that sold the watrbS SITE its doing bundles because pete comes over as a really nice bloke who loves rangers I'd imagine all QPR posters LOVE QPR. I'm not sure it's Pete's image that sold WATRB. But I certainly have always acknowledged it's large audience. So obviously people go there because they enjoy going there, want ITK information, etc. .... so to trully get this site kicking our agenda should be to be nice to any one who comes onto this site and to promote QPR Anybody who visits here will of course be treated nicely. Pete, Paladini, anyone. Of course. Not because it will get more visitors but because it's the way to do things. They are guests. They should be treated as guests.
|
|
|
Post by eusebio13 on Apr 12, 2009 9:00:59 GMT
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 9:11:50 GMT
Absolutely shameless! Good response
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 12:43:36 GMT
|
|
|
Post by londonranger on Apr 12, 2009 13:05:42 GMT
Pete will come on this site when dragged kicking and screaming.
|
|
|
Post by sandyhoops on Apr 12, 2009 14:35:39 GMT
Is it me - or is Peter and his WATRB site getting rather "big for their boots"?
We've been working very hard over at VitalQPR to build up our site - like you guys here, with honesty, integrity and a great bunch of regulars who have a wide variety of opinions but never undermine each other or contradict themselves.
Seems like WATRB thinks they have more influence around the internet as well as the Club than they really do.
Or have I missed something essential here?
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 14:47:33 GMT
Of course they want it both ways: To avoid any blame for the axing "We have no influence" and "majority on WATRB voted against Sousa axing" - Totally ignoring the "Campaign to Discredit Sousa" conducted by Pete for the past month plus (always throwing in the unctuous "I'm entitled to my opininon.) A stalking horse I called him. And I continue to believe that. re his being a recipient and a user of confidential information: Re the Sousa axing. No response. Re other material "I have many sources" Right re the boasting. Well that's a character matter. He made repeated dismissive comments about this site's small size. (I guess for Pete, Size Does Count) He has repeatedly refused to come on here: That's obviously for one of two reasons (or both): He's SCARED to come on this site; or he's afraid this site will continue to grow and he was trying to avoid contributing in any way to this site. (That he has posted on dot.org, LFW and Fans strengthens this) There was also the element of hypocisy: He used to disparage me as promoting this site on his board. When to a far greater degree, that's exactly what he did with WATRB before it was formed and just after - going on to sites repeatedly. And of course his site proclaimed itself the Fans #1 site - even as QPR Report Blog probably had a bigger daily visitorship. But I didn't go around saying hey look at QPR Report (except briefly to annoy Pete!) A couple of others! Makes wild about accusations and snide comments and doesn't apologize. Banned me three times for what I said on OTHER sites. Again no apology or explanation. And as I noted above in my praise for Scott when he resigned as a WATRB moderator because of some of its posts. To be charitable, they were in the past "insensitive" to anti-Semitic and racist inuendos. And Pete himself was a defender of all points of view being presented which included clearly beyond the pale (beyond the pale except for Pete) stuff. So yes. But beware of hubris. And as his grandparents probably told him: Pride comes before a fall. That enough for right now?
|
|
|
Post by sandyhoops on Apr 12, 2009 15:33:42 GMT
That just about sums it up for me - thanks :-D
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 15:35:44 GMT
Oh I was just warming up - And of course, I'm speaking as one who was one their leading posters! Just call me the Dexter Blackstock of WATRB ;D Other terms that come to mind: Snide and derogatory and non-sensical
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 19:39:44 GMT
And then there was the time that Pete spoke about THE League Cup Final occurring in 1968. Now some wondered how earth one could make such a mistake. Like saying QPR almost won the Championship in 1977 or that the World Cup Occurred in 1965 or the Battle of Hastings in 1067. Just iconic dates for any true believer. Anyway, beyond WATRB setting out the rules to try and limit responsibility, I see no expressions of remorse or culpability by Pete. Shameful behavior begets shameful behavior. So when's Pete coming to post here? Don't know!
|
|
bigade
Gerry Francis
Posts: 93
|
Post by bigade on Apr 12, 2009 19:51:22 GMT
sometimes the anti sousa stuff was becoming worse than tedium in my opinion.still the doubters certainly got their wish in the end.some fans are so fickle just like our so called illustrious ::)leader.there are some people who's agenda is cast in stone and most of those consider ian holloway a legend,well not in my book.he had possibly the best squad in that division when we got promoted and it still went to the last day.oh well as they say thats history.
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 12, 2009 21:05:32 GMT
|
|
|
Post by sandyhoops on Apr 12, 2009 22:27:47 GMT
I love the "we've only been going for one month" jibe.
Sorry Scott, how can you honestly think that just coz you change your URL it means you're only a month old? Yes on THAT particular URL.
But that spin is worthy of anything that comes out of the government - let alone a football club called QPR!
|
|