| Author | Topic: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report Claim (Read 2,859 times) |
eastpaddoknutta Terry Venables
   member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Mackie-IF-1.png)
1882 fanatic - not an Armature radio enthusiast - got a problem tell your "mods"
Joined: Jun 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2,542 Location: Feltham
| |
Macmoish Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://65.98.18.218/images/P/0019_l.jpg)
.
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 39,495
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #121 on Apr 21, 2011, 2:24pm » | |
I'm fully aware people of that. Which is why time after time, we've tried to ignore these various efforts emanating from that source and his friends. Many of them you don't even know about.
But when falsehoods are uttered - not opinion, but falsehoods - every now and then, a response is warranted: If only it entails drawing attention to what's being said.
And as I said Nutta: Go onto WATRB and "speak truth to power" there, by posting the same sentiments and admonitions to Pete.
|
"..I also find it insulting that qpr-reports site are asking so many questions. They seem to want to know everything that goes on at the club..." |
|
Bushman Administrator
     QPR Report Archivist member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1227.photobucket.com/albums/ee423/jenufa1/1936-37/williambirrellmanager1of1.jpg)
Joined: Oct 2008 Gender: Male  Posts: 7,065 Location: The Bush & Herefordshire
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #122 on Apr 21, 2011, 2:27pm » | |
This is a terrible waste of energy. I know things have been said in the past as well as the present and I am sure will be said in the future, but what is being said is a nonsense and it turns into silly playground tit for tat antics. We on this board are far better than that and should not take the bait.
|
They say the lights are always bright on Broadway. They say theres always magic in the air.
|
|
Macmoish Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://65.98.18.218/images/P/0019_l.jpg)
.
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 39,495
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #123 on Apr 21, 2011, 2:37pm » | |
Apr 21, 2011, 2:27pm, Bushman wrote:This is a terrible waste of energy. ....We on this board are far better than that and should not take the bait.  |
|
You're so right, Bushman...But, to go back to another quote from the Good Book! "The Spirit is Willing, but the Flesh is weak"
|
"..I also find it insulting that qpr-reports site are asking so many questions. They seem to want to know everything that goes on at the club..." |
|
eastpaddoknutta Terry Venables
   member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Mackie-IF-1.png)
1882 fanatic - not an Armature radio enthusiast - got a problem tell your "mods"
Joined: Jun 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2,542 Location: Feltham
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #124 on Apr 21, 2011, 2:42pm » | |
Apr 21, 2011, 2:24pm, Macmoish wrote:I'm fully aware people of that. Which is why time after time, we've tried to ignore these various efforts emanating from that source and his friends. Many of them you don't even know about.
But when falsehoods are uttered - not opinion, but falsehoods - every now and then, a response is warranted: If only it entails drawing attention to what's being said.
And as I said Nutta: Go onto WATRB and "speak truth to power" there, by posting the same sentiments and admonitions to Pete.
|
|
i would do it face to face if it was spoken about but i never get the indication that thats what pete wants to do as i said theres prob better things to speak about mike
its still comes down to the same thing everytime and being honest report and watrb have one difference on "ONE" topic and everyting that goes around it?
if i go there and same the same thing every poster would say "well why dont you go and ask mike at reports site?"
back to the circle affect of he said, they said she said
why dont "REPORT" and "WATRB" just agree for every ones sake new and old to discuss it between your selfves if it has to be debated or become worthy of debating
leave your personal differances aside and both parties stop being so defensive to it all
this one time both take to the higher ground and leave it at that
|
[IMGhttp://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Derry-IF.png[/IMG] ![[image] [image]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Hill-IF.png) |
|
Macmoish Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://65.98.18.218/images/P/0019_l.jpg)
.
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 39,495
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #125 on Apr 21, 2011, 2:48pm » | |
Nutta
Thanks.
I'll say it one last time (or maybe not last time!)
Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site.
Pete then on WATRB elaborated and made several points about this site.
Now you and other can certainly make a good case that I and others should ignore those comments.
But it's not valid to make it a "Plague on both your houses."
|
"..I also find it insulting that qpr-reports site are asking so many questions. They seem to want to know everything that goes on at the club..." |
|
Markqpr Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m9uw17daMl1rzyihbo1_500.gif)
Ray Manzarek, Rest In Peace (1939 - 2013)
Joined: Oct 2008 Gender: Male  Posts: 5,860
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #126 on Apr 21, 2011, 3:24pm » | |
Apr 21, 2011, 1:37pm, eastpaddoknutta wrote: its massively disscussed and "debated" |
|
I've always thought you were a mass debater.
|
![[image] [image]](http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/5019/tatsmall.jpg) Tony Fernandes: “Many people do not realise the power of sport to market a brand” “You can spend £40 million on advertising and have nothing like the same effect." “It can’t be about one benefactor. I might be hit by a bus". |
|
eastpaddoknutta Terry Venables
   member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Mackie-IF-1.png)
1882 fanatic - not an Armature radio enthusiast - got a problem tell your "mods"
Joined: Jun 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2,542 Location: Feltham
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #127 on Apr 21, 2011, 3:49pm » | |
Apr 21, 2011, 2:48pm, Macmoish wrote:Nutta
Thanks.
I'll say it one last time (or maybe not last time!)
Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site.
Pete then on WATRB elaborated and made several points about this site.
Now you and other can certainly make a good case that I and others should ignore those comments.
But it's not valid to make it a "Plague on both your houses." |
|
Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site
which didnt realy needed to be responded to
Pete then on WATRB elaborated and made several points about this site.
which was because there was something on here, a reaction for hi to do so
Now you and other can certainly make a good case that I and others should ignore those comments.
now my case and all ways have been, if pete is a vile human being and has an agenda against this site, and pete thinks that Reports users antaganise him wind him up etc
and mike your self and report are not and dont go about the siutation like that
why is there a 5 page thread about it? why is report seeking answers
you have tried time and time again and frankly i think its not worth it i dont want any one to debate this and it will be the last time that i say anything about because now it seems like i care or im bothered
i just dont think its worth it
from an outsiders point of view it dosent matter what report or watrb prove by you tube vids funny pictures radio shows media cuttings or meetings with gianni or players of the club
it looks childish from both parties, visualy.
i hope i dont offend no one id rather have this lot wiped of the message board all together
im looking forward to cardiff so much and im disapointed that the points deduction is the highlight at present on this and on any other site which is y i talk on 1882 coz i like babes booze and having a laugh when i come online not same old same old
onwards and upwords
U R'SSSSSSSSSSS
|
[IMGhttp://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Derry-IF.png[/IMG] ![[image] [image]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Hill-IF.png) |
|
eastpaddoknutta Terry Venables
   member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Mackie-IF-1.png)
1882 fanatic - not an Armature radio enthusiast - got a problem tell your "mods"
Joined: Jun 2009 Gender: Male  Posts: 2,542 Location: Feltham
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #128 on Apr 21, 2011, 3:50pm » | |
Apr 21, 2011, 3:24pm, Markqpr wrote:
No im just mass lol
|
[IMGhttp://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Derry-IF.png[/IMG] ![[image] [image]](http://i1129.photobucket.com/albums/m501/greeksuperhoop/Hill-IF.png) |
|
cpr Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll8/isbjh123/cpr2-1.jpg)
Who is BazWoT?
Joined: Oct 2008 Gender: Male  Posts: 22,703 Location: Walton on Thames
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #129 on Apr 21, 2011, 6:28pm » | |
"Pete on the Jnetradio made a certain statement about this site"
"which didnt realy needed to be responded to"
Nutta!
Why didn't it need to be responded to? Because it's OK for Pete to make a scattergun assault on numerous posters on this board without any recourse? Totally wrong, his comments wereo out of order as Isleworth has already attested to!
Go on his site and tell him there was no need to use someone else's radio show to have a pop and then we would not be discussing this.
By the way, it's gone on this long because you've prolonged it yourself. 
As an aside, qblockpete is not banned from this site, never has been. AND THAT'S A FACT.
I suppose we could post a list of banned posters and they will not be a surprise to anyone!
|
|
|
Macmoish Administrator
     member is offline
![[avatar] [avatar]](http://65.98.18.218/images/P/0019_l.jpg)
.
Joined: Oct 2008 Posts: 39,495
|  | Re: Talk QPR on Jnet - WATRB's Pete's QPR Report C « Reply #130 on Apr 22, 2011, 6:19am » | |
I'm going to lock this thread now. Just as Pete has locked the thread on WATRB.
I am not going to say "Time to Move On' or "This is my last word on the subject." And I have no doubt about the merits. Or a repeated pattern that we have seen and experienced.
But I am cognizant of the fact that most people on this board are not interested in board wars. You post or read this site for a reason. And this site is growing so well for a reason. And that reason is certainly not because you want to engage in an intra-board dispute. Certainly not with this particular person.
So I'll just conclude this thread with Pete's "concluding" post on this subject on WATRB.
And to all of you I can only say: Onward and Upward
"Going to close the thread, as really don't want this tit for tat. Anything I say gets copied and pasted. I see my boy (hardly he is 28, but you know what I mean) as posted, I've told him to keep off.
They are a happy band of brothers, should be kept that way. QPR report has been a master over the years of declaring his undying love for the club, he sees himself as kind of figurehead, when in fact he is a supporter like me or you. I don't care if his last game was in 1969, but don't go arround trying to be above everyone else in terms of supporting the club.
I'd expect an influx of posters from that site on here after the FA hearing, so I'd rather wait in anticipation for that."
|
"..I also find it insulting that qpr-reports site are asking so many questions. They seem to want to know everything that goes on at the club..." |
| |
|