|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 16, 2009 12:40:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 17, 2009 6:14:41 GMT
More re Fulham The Guardian
Fulham post £7.5m losses• Club have cut losses from £15.2m a year
• Seventeen per cent increase in player wages a factorFulham, despite a £10m injection of Premier League cash, have posted losses of £7.5m in the last financial year. The club say they have cut their losses from £15.2m a year. The increase in Premier League money is as a result of the fee Sky paid for broadcast rights and has helped the club to reduce their losses. Meanwhile higher gate receipts (up from £8.7m in 2006-07 to £9.5m in 2007-8) have contributed to a 35% increase in revenue. However wages paid to the club's players have also increased by 17% to £68.6m last year, forcing owner Mohamed Fayed to continue his support of the club he has owned since buying it for £30m in 1997. Transfer fees also ate into Fulham's budget after the acquisition of players such as Danny Murphy, signed for an undisclosed fee in the summer of 2007. www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/apr/16/fulham-losses-football-premier-league |
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 17, 2009 6:15:21 GMT
And West HamThe Guardian
Banks take control at West Ham as financial crisis deepens• Gudmundsson ousted as Icelandic administrators move in
• Gianfranco Zola to have no more spending money over summerWest Ham United will be taken over by a consortium of international banks in the coming weeks. Icelandic government-appointed officials running the stricken investment bank Straumur are set to take control from Bjorgolfur Gudmundsson at Upton Park as they seek to recover the money lost in the collapse of that nation's economy. Straumur was last month declared "effectively insolvent" by the UK's Financial Services Authority as it took steps to protect the deposits of investors at its branch in London. Twenty-four hours later it was nationalised by the Icelandic government. Straumur provided the bulk of the finance for Gudmundsson when he bought the club in 2006 from its shareholders, led by the then chairman, Terry Brown, in an £85m deal. But since the collapse in the Icelandic economy and the meltdown of his investment vehicle, Hansa, last year, Gudmundsson's ability to maintain ownership has been in serious doubt. Despite a moratorium on Gudmundsson's debts until June, won last month in the Icelandic courts, Straumur's banking creditors are now preparing to take advantage of covenants on the debt that allow for the club to be taken over. It is believed that the banks will form a new board, with Gudmundsson making way. But West Ham fans looking for reassurance over the future of the club will find no comfort in the latest development. The club remains up for sale, although the incoming owners are understood to be patient as they look to achieve a big price for the Hammers. That means the consortium of about half a dozen banks nominated by more than 40 institutions – Straumur's creditors – expect to remain in charge of West Ham next season and probably well in to 2011. But although Gudmundsson is set to relinquish control, there will be no fresh investment for Gianfranco Zola to buy players and any summer spending will have to come from cash generated by sales. There is also likely to be pressure to make further cutbacks following the overindulgence of the previous chairman, Eggert Magnusson, which alarmed the club's owner so much he was sacked. However, Zola's value to the new owners is clear from his record since arriving with his assistant Steve Clarke early this season. The Italian has achieved a strong performance in the Premier League in spite of the departure of nearly £20m of playing talent with the sales of Craig Bellamy, Matthew Etherington and Hayden Mullins in January. With six league games remaining, West Ham remain in contention for a place in next season's Europa Cup, a fact that has done well to hide the difficulties off the pitch. This column revealed last month that the club's accountants, Deloitte, had refused to sign-off West Ham's annual report due to the uncertainty over how much compensation it would have to pay Sheffield United for the illegal use of Carlos Tevez that was found to have contributed to the Bramall Lane club's relegation. In the event that amounted to £25m, payable over five years. Zola has admitted that Matthew Upson may leave in the summer following the 29-year-old's comments that if the club fail to qualify for next season's Europa Cup the England defender will consider his options. "I believe Matthew is enjoying what he's doing," said Zola. "But you will have to ask him. I don't want to be the one who is selling something that doesn't belong to me." Upson, who is thought to interest former club, Arsenal, and Manchester City, has two years remaining on his current deal but Zola would not be drawn on the subject of a new contract. "I don't know, we will see. We are going to talk to him and see if he can be happy staying here." www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/apr/17/west-ham-united-iceland-banks-zola
|
|
|
|
Post by weavie on Apr 17, 2009 7:53:06 GMT
why didnt we bring in zola instead of sousa
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 17, 2009 7:54:24 GMT
If we had done, and he'd had as poor a start at QPR as I think he did initially have at West Ham, who's to say he would have still been at QPR at the end of the season.
|
|
|
|
Post by cpr on Apr 17, 2009 8:45:06 GMT
What difference would Zola have made weavie?
Him and Sousa were vitually identical candidates, great ex-players coaching their county's under 21 teams.
Zola had two advantages over Sousa, the club was in some turmoil so his initial problems were overshadowed by outside forces, he had the foresight and knowledge to arm himself with Steve Clark as his assistant.
|
|
