|
|
Post by myu on Apr 9, 2009 13:22:13 GMT
Mike you have taken this way to far, you are spreading rumors that are not correct and which only you that believe.
Pete was right to ban you and how you think that WATRB is to be blamed for Sousa getting the sack is beyond me, that's if he does.
I thought Flavio was the man who called the shots at HQ?
We don't have 10 posters who we can keep control over on our board we have so many posting and thats what a message board is all about, if one says that he met someone and he said 'so & so', it will be posted by members and it don't mean its true.
Why would we remove it and we had no idea it was going to lead to anything, that poster was trying to defend Sousa!
You have no idea whats going on and chatting rubbish.
|
|
|
|
Post by Zamoraaaah on Apr 9, 2009 14:30:55 GMT
MYU
Stop being an attention w.hore and all the veiled digs at this board. It suits your mate GPete but not you. It just makes you look like a big Jessie and you are better than that.
|
|
|
|
Post by QPR Report on Apr 9, 2009 14:39:16 GMT
Mike you have taken this way to far, you are spreading rumors that are not correct and which only you that believe. Pete was right to ban you and how you think that WATRB is to be blamed for Sousa getting the sack is beyond me, that's if he does. I thought Flavio was the man who called the shots at HQ? We don't have 10 posters who we can keep control over on our board we have so many posting and thats what a message board is all about, if one says that he met someone and he said 'so & so', it will be posted by members and it don't mean its true. Why would we remove it and we had no idea it was going to lead to anything, that poster was trying to defend Sousa! You have no idea whats going on and chatting rubbish. Myu I will of course do as you requested. Although personally I always found those posters on all the boards who requested their accounts to be deleted, really silly: All they had to do is stop posting. Hope you get to read this response. And not just take what Pete says as gospel What I have said is that Pete has been running a campaign against Sousa. Not WATRB - where the vast majority have supported him. But Pete. And no one can deny it. I never said that Pete was RESPONSIBLE for Sousa getting the sack. I said Pete must be happy with the result.. And maybe contributed in some small way. If you're suggesting that I in ANY WAY that WATRB is deliberately responsible for Sousa being sacked over that posted meeting comments or that I in any way blame WATRB for those posted comments. Again you're 100% wrong. And won't be able to find any evidence of that. What I DID say was that Pete on that thread responded to an asserted statement Sousa made about that Portugese signing with an assertion that if true, clearly came from within the club. So clearly Pete wants to ban me from his site. That is his prerogative. And you want to cease belonging to this site. And I will so oblige. But don't accuse me of saying thing I didn't say; or making charges against Pete or you or WATRB or implying anything As I noted on another thread. When I thought yesterday that you and Pete and WATRB might be in trouble re your "legal" statement, I pmd you sending you my best wishes. So don't fly off the handle at me. And says things I didn't say. I would suggest that you make these assertions of what I said, that you actually READ my comments on here or on the dot.org. Now again: WATRB is the only site I'm aware of that actually bans you for things you say elsewhere. This is the third time WATRB has done that. I will give you a few hours just in case you want to respond or pm me since I obviously can't contact you. And then I will do as you requested. |
|
